BackgroundMedication counseling is a critical component of pharmaceutical care to promote the safe and effective use of medications and to maximize therapeutic outcomes. The assessment of patients’ and pharmacists’ satisfaction with medication counseling services could be one of the vital parameters for predicting the quality of pharmacy services. No study has measured and compared both patients’ and pharmacists’ satisfaction with medication counseling. The objectives of this study were to describe and compare patients’ and pharmacists’ levels of satisfaction with medication counseling services offered by community pharmacists in South Korea.MethodsThis was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey. The online survey was distributed to patients and community pharmacists using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaires consisted of 4 main areas: (1) responders’ characteristics (2) current state of medication counseling methods provided by community pharmacies (3) overall satisfaction with medication counseling (4) demand for the development of medication counseling standards. A comparison between patients and pharmacists was made using either a chi-square test or a Fisher’s exact test.ResultsBetween June 13, 2014 and July 15, 2014, a total of 252 patients and 620 pharmacists completed the survey. It was found that 47.3 % of pharmacists and 34.0 % of patients were satisfied with the current medication counseling service. Pharmacists showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the medication counseling service compared to patients (p <0.05). A major reason for patients not being satisfied with the medication counseling from community pharmacists was the insufficient time spent on counseling (51.2 %). The pharmacists’ perception of a major barrier to providing appropriate medication counseling for patients was the lack of time (24.3 %). Moreover, a substantial number of patients (88 %) and pharmacists (73 %) supported the development of medication counseling standards to improve community pharmacist counseling services (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThis study showed that both patients and pharmacists have low levels of satisfaction with the current medication counseling service offered by community pharmacists. This study provides baseline data for the development of national guidelines for medication counseling by pharmacists.

Background Esomeprazole is the most effective treatment for acid-related disorders and is widely used with enteric coating due to rapid degradation in the acidic environment. However, the enteric-coated formulation delays absorption and onset of action. To overcome this limitation, an immediate-release formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 800 mg (IR-ESO) was developed. Purpose To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of IR-ESO compared to those of esomeprazole 20 mg (ESO). Methods A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 7 days. After single and multiple dosing, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-hr pH monitoring. Results Plasma esomeprazole exposure of IR-ESO was similar to that of ESO after single and multiple dosing. Time to peak concentration of IR-ESO (0.50–0.75 hr) was shorter than that of ESO (1.25–1.50 hr). Percentage changes in 24-hr integrated gastric acidity from baseline for IR-ESO were similar to those for ESO. In addition, mean time to maintain gastric pH >4 for 24 hr was similar for both drugs (IR-ESO 55.5–69.9% vs ESO 56.8–70.2%). Evaluation of time to first reach pH 4 after dosing indicated that IR-ESO showed a faster onset than ESO. All subjects found the drug tolerable, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between two drugs. Conclusion This study showed that IR-ESO produced a rapid, safe and sustained gastric acid suppression (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03211143).

Background Sufentanil is commonly used for analgesia and sedation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Both ECMO and the pathophysiological changes derived from critical illness have significant effects on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs, yet reports of ECMO and sufentanil PK are scarce. Here, we aimed to develop a population PK model of sufentanil in ECMO patients and to suggest dosing recommendations. Methods This prospective cohort PK study included 20 patients who received sufentanil during venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO). Blood samples were collected for 96 h during infusion and 72 h after cessation of sufentanil. A population PK model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the final PK parameters with two typical doses. Results A two-compartment model best described the PK of sufentanil. In our final model, increased volume of distribution and decreased values for clearance were reported compared with previous PK data from non-ECMO patients. Covariate analysis showed that body temperature and total plasma protein level correlated positively with systemic clearance (CL) and peripheral volume of distribution (V2), respectively, and improved the model. The parameter estimates of the final model were as follows: CL = 37.8 × EXP (0.207 × (temperature − 36.9)) L h −1 , central volume of distribution (V1) = 229 L, V2 = 1640 × (total plasma protein/4.5) 2.46 L, and intercompartmental clearance ( Q ) = 41 L h −1 . Based on Monte Carlo simulation results, an infusion of 17.5 μg h −1 seems to reach target sufentanil concentration (0.3–0.6 μg L −1 ) in most ECMO patients except hypothermic patients (33 °C). In hypothermic patients, over-sedation, which could induce respiratory depression, needs to be monitored especially when their total plasma protein level is low. Conclusions This is the first report on a population PK model of sufentanil in ECMO patients. Our results suggest that close monitoring of the body temperature and total plasma protein level is crucial in ECMO patients who receive sufentanil to provide effective analgesia and sedation and promote recovery. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02581280 , December 1st, 2014.

JOINS, an herbal anti-arthritic drug, was developed for the treatment and pain relief of knee osteoarthritis. It was approved for use in Korea by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2001. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of JOINS on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of aceclofenac in healthy adults. A PK drug-drug interaction study was conducted in 61 healthy subjects by using an open-label, multiple-dose, one sequence, two-period design. Blood samples were collected for plasma concentrations of aceclofenac during the reference period (aceclofenac 100 mg alone) and interaction period (aceclofenac 100 mg + JOINS 300 mg). The area under the curve within a dosing interval (τ) at steady state (AUC τ,ss ) and the C max at steady state (C max,ss ) of aceclofenac were analyzed by a non-compartment model using the Phoenix® WinNonlin® software version 6.3 (Pharsight, Mountain View, CA, USA). The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the AUC τ,ss of aceclofenac with JOINS to without JOINS (D4/D3 and D11/D3) were 0.9593-1.0130 and 0.9745-1.0291, respectively, and the corresponding values for the C max,ss of aceclofenac with JOINS to without JOINS (D4/D3 and D11/D3) were 0.8578-0.9795 and 0.8510-0.9717. Aceclofenac alone or co-administered with JOINS was safe and well tolerated with no serious adverse drug reactions or significant differences in the severity of adverse events (AEs) between the two treatment groups. We conclude that co-administration of aceclofenac with JOINS does not influence the PK and safety profiles of aceclofenac.