ObjectiveThis study examined the association of initial provider treatment with early and long-term opioid use in a national sample of patients with new-onset low back pain (LBP).DesignA retrospective cohort study of patients with new-onset LBP from 2008 to 2013.SettingThe study evaluated outpatient and inpatient claims from patient visits, pharmacy claims and inpatient and outpatient procedures with initial providers seen for new-onset LBP.Participants216 504 individuals aged 18 years or older across the USA who were diagnosed with new-onset LBP and were opioid-naïve were included. Participants had commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance.ExposuresThe primary independent variable is type of initial healthcare provider including physicians and conservative therapists (physical therapists, chiropractors, acupuncturists).Main outcome measuresShort-term opioid use (within 30 days of the index visit) following new LBP visit and long-term opioid use (starting within 60 days of the index date and either 120 or more days’ supply of opioids over 12 months, or 90 days or more supply of opioids and 10 or more opioid prescriptions over 12 months).ResultsShort-term use of opioids was 22%. Patients who received initial treatment from chiropractors or physical therapists had decreased odds of short-term and long-term opioid use compared with those who received initial treatment from primary care physicians (PCPs) (adjusted OR (AOR) (95% CI) 0.10 (0.09 to 0.10) and 0.15 (0.13 to 0.17), respectively). Compared with PCP visits, initial chiropractic and physical therapy also were associated with decreased odds of long-term opioid use in a propensity score matched sample (AOR (95% CI) 0.21 (0.16 to 0.27) and 0.29 (0.12 to 0.69), respectively).ConclusionsInitial visits to chiropractors or physical therapists is associated with substantially decreased early and long-term use of opioids. Incentivising use of conservative therapists may be a strategy to reduce risks of early and long-term opioid use.

BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is prevalent, management benefits from high-quality clinical practice guidelines, and yet LBP is a common source of low value care. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between the type of initial contact health care provider (HCP), service utilization, and total episode cost for the management of LBP.MethodsEpisode of care was used to analyze a US national sample of LBP episodes completed in 2017-2019. A combined surgical and non-surgical (pooled) sample and a non-surgical sample were separately analyzed. The primary independent variable was the type of the initial contact HCP. Dependent measures included rate and timing of use of 14 types of health care services and total episode cost. The association between initial contact HCP, total episode cost and rate of prescription opioid and NSAID use was tested using a mixed effects model.ResultsThe study included 616,766 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older with 756,631 episodes of LBP involving 386,795 HCPs and incurring $1,010,495,291 in expenditures. A primary care or specialist HCP was initially contacted in 62.0% of episodes, with these episodes associated with early use of low-value services such as imaging, pharmacologic, and interventional services. A non-prescribing HCP was initially contacted in 32.5% of episodes with these episodes associated with early use of guideline recommended first line services. Each type of HCP emphasized different initial services with little indication of a stepped approach to managing LBP. Following adjustment for covariates chiropractors were associated with the lowest total episode cost. As an observational study of associations, numerous confounders may have impacted results.ConclusionsAn individual with LBP has different experiences based on the type of HCP initially contacted. Initial contact with primary care or specialist HCPs is associated with second- and third-line services provided before first line services, with little indication of a guideline recommended stepped approach to managing LBP. Increasing the likelihood of guideline-concordant, high-value care for LBP may require systemic changes to the health care delivery system. In the absence of red flags these changes may include increasing the proportion of individuals receiving early non-pharmacological treatment, either through improving direct access to non-prescribing HCPs or increasing timely referrals from primary care and specialist health care providers.

Low back pain (LBP) has received considerable attention from researchers and health care systems because of its substantial personal, social, work-related, and economic consequences. A narrative review was conducted summarizing data about the epidemiology, care seeking, and utilization patterns for LBP in the adult US population. Recommendations from a consensus of clinical practice guidelines were compared to findings about the current state of clinical practice for LBP. The impact of the first provider consulted on the quality and value of care was analyzed longitudinally across the continuum of episodes of care. The review concludes with a description of recently published evidence that has demonstrated that favorable health and economic outcomes can be achieved by incorporating evidence-informed decision criteria and guidance about entry into conservative low back care pathways. (Population Health Management 2013;16:390-396)

Background: For individuals with neck pain (NP) the initial contact health care provider (HCP) and subsequent services used are less well understood than for low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this retrospective observational study of administrative data was to examine the association between type of initial contact HCP, service utilization, and total episode cost for the management of NP. Methods: A US national sample of NP episodes completed in 2017-2019 was analyzed using episode of care as the unit of analysis. Separate analyses of a combined surgical and non-surgical (pooled) sample and a non-surgical sample were performed. Seventeen types of HCP initially contacted by an individual with NP was the primary independent variable. Dependent measures included rate and timing of use of fourteen types of health care services and total episode cost. A mixed effects model applied to pooled and non-surgical samples was used to test the association between initial contact HCP, total episode cost and rate of prescription opioid and NSAID use for NP. Results: The study included 323,348 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older with 390,992 complete episodes of NP involving 321,538 HCPs and incurring $472,399,064 in expenditures. 53.0% of episodes had initial contact with a primary care or specialist HCP, with these episodes associated with higher rates of imaging, pharmacologic, and interventional services. 40.4% of episodes had initial contact with a non-prescribing HCP, with these episodes associated with higher rates of non-pharmacological services. Adjusted total episode cost was lowest when a chiropractor was the initial contact HCP. Results were consistent for individuals experiencing single or multiple episodes during the study period. Conclusions: This study of a large national cohort of commercially insured individuals with NP helps fill a knowledge gap regarding NP care pathway attributes. Like LBP, the treatment of NP is highly variable with the initial HCP selected by an individual with NP associated with differences in services received and episode cost. Initial contact with a non-prescribing HCP was associated with lower rates of imaging, pharmacology, and interventional services.