No abstract

Purpose Data from solid tumor malignancies suggest that actual body weight (ABW) dosing improves overall outcomes. There is the potential to compromise efficacy when chemotherapy dosages are reduced, but the impact of dose adjustment on clinical response and toxicity in hematologic malignancies is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of utilizing a percent of ABW for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induction chemotherapy dosing. Methods This retrospective, single-center study included 146 patients who received 7 + 3 induction (cytarabine and anthracycline) for treatment of AML. Study design evaluated the relationship between percentage of ABW dosing and complete response (CR) rates in patients newly diagnosed with AML. Results Percentage of ABW dosing did not influence CR rates in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for AML (p = 0.83); nor did it influence rate of death at 30 days or relapse at 6 months (p = 0.94). When comparing patients dosed at 90–100 % of ABW compared to <90 % ABW, CR rates were not significantly different in patients classified as poor risk (p = 0.907). All favorable risk category patients obtained CR. Conclusions Preemptive dose reductions for obesity did not influence CR rates for patients with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy and did not influence the composite endpoint of death at 30 days or disease relapse at 6 months.

Cetuximab is approved for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab is generally well tolerated, but does carry a black box warning for infusion reactions (IRs). Incidence of IR in clinical trials was 15-20% for all grades and 3-5% for grades III-IV. Retrospective studies reported a higher incidence of all grade IRs and grades III-IV IR in areas of the Southeastern United States. Information regarding rechallenge doses after an IR has not been well described. At our institution, we frequently rechallenge on the same day after an initial IR. The primary objective was to determine the incidence, timing, IR grade, and completion of a rechallenge dose in patients who experienced an initial IR. Secondary objectives included: (1) determining the incidence and grade of IR in patients who received a first dose of cetuximab and (2) identifying specific risk factors for cetuximab IR with the first dose. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted in SCCHN patients treated with cetuximab between June 2008 and September 2015 at the University of Kansas Hospital Cancer Center and inpatient setting. The majority of patients (87.9%) were able to be quickly and successfully rechallenged after an initial IR. Minimal patients (27.6%) experienced a rechallenge IR, resulting in only 1 patient discontinuation. Rechallenge doses were most frequently (37.9%) administered between 30 and 59 min after initial dose discontinuation. This was a single-center retrospective study based on data collected from electronic medical records. Other limitations include interpretation of infusion reactions on a subjective basis by providers. These findings demonstrate the practice of same-day rechallenges in initial IR patients is feasible and safe.

Background Invasive fungal infections remain problematic in immunosuppressed allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients and the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of graft-versus-host-disease can increase the risk three-fold. Although antifungal prophylaxis has been shown to decrease the incidence of infection, the optimal antifungal prophylactic regimen in this patient population has yet to be identified. Since early diagnosis of fungal infections might not be possible and the treatment of established fungal infections might be difficult and associated with high infection related mortality, prevention has become an important strategy in reducing overall morbidity and mortality. While triazoles are the preferred agents, some patients are unable to tolerate them and an alternative drug is warranted. Objectives To assess the tolerability of once weekly liposomal amphotericin B as a prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation by evaluating any adverse events leading to its discontinuation. In terms of efficacy, to also compare the outcome and incidence of invasive fungal infections in patients who received amphotericin B, triazoles, and echinocandins. Results A total of 101 allogeneic transplant recipients receiving corticosteroids for the treatment of graft-versus-host-disease and antifungal prophylaxis were evaluated from August 2009 to September 2012. Liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg intravenous once weekly was found to be well-tolerated. The incidence of invasive fungal infections was 19%, 17%, and 7% in the liposomal amphotericin B, echinocandin, and triazole groups, respectively. Two deaths occurred in the liposomal amphotericin B group and one death occurred in the echinocandin group. None of the deaths were fungal infection-related. Conclusion Antifungal prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B was well-tolerated but the incidence of invasive fungal infections in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B was higher than other antifungal agents in this study. The optimal dose and schedule of liposomal amphotericin B for antifungal prophylaxis in this patient population is still not known and considering its broad spectrum activity, prospective trials in comparison to triazoles are warranted.

No abstract