Anti-racist education within the Academy holds the potential to truly reflect the cultural hybridity of our diverse, multi-cultural society through the canons of knowledge that educators celebrate, proffer and embody. The centrality of Whiteness as an instrument of power and privilege ensures that particular types of knowledge continue to remain omitted from our curriculums. The monopoly and proliferation of dominant White European canons does comprise much of our existing curriculum; consequently, this does impact on aspects of engagement, inclusivity and belonging particularly for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) learners. This paper explores the impact of a dominant Eurocentric curriculum and the Decolonising the Curriculum agenda within higher education and its influence upon navigating factors such as BAME attainment, engagement and belonging within the Academy. This paper draws on a Critical Race Theory (CRT) theoretical framework to centralize the marginalized voices of fifteen BAME students and three academics of colour regarding this phenomena. Aspects examined consider the impact of a narrow and restrictive curriculum on BAME students and staff and how the omission of diverse histories and multi-cultural knowledge canons facilitates marginalization and discriminatory cultures.

Imperatives to eliminate racial inequalities in higher education (HE) have led to calls for diversification of curricula. Qualitative evidence is growing about racially minoritised students' perceptions of their curricula and its impact on them. Yet there are no specific instruments to facilitate evaluation of curricular diversification and its impact on students. We examined the relationship between students' perceptions of the cultural sensitivity of their curriculum and their engagement, as measured by students' interactions with their teachers and their interest in their programme of study. To do so, we conceptualised and developed a new set of four Culturally Sensitive Curriculum Scales, making a significant, original conceptual and methodological contribution. A racially diverse sample of second through postgraduate students primarily in arts, humanities and social sciences (N = 262; 189 F) rated the cultural sensitivity of the curriculum of their programme, their interactions with teachers, and their interest. Racially minoritised students (n = 157) perceived their curriculum as less culturally sensitive on all four dimensions, reported fewer academic interactions with teachers, and had lower levels of interest than White students (n = 100). Each of the four Culturally Sensitive Curriculum Scales was significantly related to academic interactions with teachers and to interest. Regression analyses showed that all dimensions of cultural sensitivity mediated effects of ethnicity on interactions with teachers. Two dimensions of cultural sensitivity (Diversity Represented and Challenge Power) mediated effects of ethnicity on interest. Therefore, ensuring curricula are diverse and critical may support racially minoritised students' engagement, potentially contributing to reducing achievement gaps. Further implications are discussed.

Accreditation serves as a demonstration of competency and thus improves overall laboratory quality. To ensure traceable, reliable, defensible data, quality must be approached as a philosophy rather than a program.The Cypress Environmental Laboratory (CEL), built in 2008, has based its operations on a commitment to high data quality, responsibility, and transparency.The CEL adheres to a strict standard set by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program, following practices outlined in the standard for monitoring and maintaining data quality.Background imagery by New Africa/Shutterstock.com

This chapter employs critical race theory as an analytical framework to excavate the genealogy of academic debates that theorise race, gender, and intersectionality in relation to ‘authentic knowledge’. Thomas foregrounds theoretical questions about the role of whiteness in maintaining myriad forms of epistemic inequality that is operationalised in the postsecondary education curriculum. Reflecting on a research project that aimed to broaden perspectives presented in the curriculum, he highlights how effective staff-student collaboration in reviewing reading lists can affect curricula changes by disrupting heteronormative epistemologies.