In uncontaminated natural materials, plutonium and technetium exist exclusively as products (daughters) of nuclear reactions in which uranium is the principal reactant (parent). Under conditions of chemical stability over geologic periods of time, the relative abundances of daughter and parent elements are fixed by the rates of nuclear reactions and the decay of the daughter radionuclide. The state of this nuclear secular equilibrium condition is the primary basis of the geochemical study of these elements in nature. Thus, it is critical that nuclear parent and daughter abundances are measured in the same sample. We have developed a quantitative procedure for measuring subpicogram quantities of plutonium and technetium in gram quantities of geologic matrices such as uranium ores. The procedure takes advantage of the aggressive properties of sodium peroxide/hydroxide fusion to ensure complete dissolution and homogenization of complex materials, the precision provided by isotope dilution techniques, and the extreme sensitivity offered by thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Using this technique, a quantitative aliquot can be removed for uranium analysis by isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry or α spectrometry. Although the application of the procedure is unique, the analytical concepts may find more general application in studies of environmental contamination by nuclear materials. To assess the precision and accuracy of the analytical results, blanks and standards were analyzed routinely for a 1-year period to ensure quality control of our sample analyses. The average technetium blank is 5 ± 4 fg (n = 8), and that for plutonium is 0.17 ± 0.15 pg (n = 7). Thus, the detection limit for technetium (defined as 3 times the standard deviation of the average blank) is 11 fg, and that for plutonium is 0.44 pg. To assess the procedural precision, Canadian Reference Material BL-5 was analyzed routinely with samples. The results of seven replicate analyses for technetium in this standard reference material yield a technetium concentration of 59.0 fg/g, with a remarkably small standard deviation of 0.6 fg, 1.0% of the average value. The results of six replicate analyses for the concentration of plutonium in BL-5 give 1.012 pg/g, with an equally small standard deviation of 0.016, 1.6% of the average value. No direct measure of accuracy can be done on the technetium or plutonium analyses, because no standard reference material exists for these elements. To help constrain the accuracy of our measurements, equilibrium technetium/uranium and plutonium/uranium abundances were calculated using the nuclear reaction code MCNP. For technetium, such calculations are relatively insensitive to variations in model parameters, and measurements fall within a 21% high/low bias. For plutonium, the calculations are very sensitive to model parameters and hence inherently less precise. Indirectly, spike and isotope mix calibrations made from weighted quantities of certified isotopes (both technetium and plutonium) can be used t...
Abstract. We have measured shifts in the isotopic abunctances of Gd and Sm in soils from the Apollo 17 deep drill stem and calculated the neutron fluence from these measurements. The measurements show two well defined regions of nearly constant fluence: (1) a thick deep section with a very large neutron fluence, and (2) a thinner shallow region with a small fluence. This depth dependence is most plausibly described by a model of rapid accumulation in the last 100-200 m.y., the layered structure reflecting accumulations of isotopically homogeneous source material. This interpretation is compatible with a variety of other characteristics of the soils, including the spallation produced 126 Xe normalized to target element abundances.An alternative model of deposition, followed by irradiation without mixing, followed by shallow mixing will quantitatively describe the data. The model yields an age of 1.25 AE for the bottom of the drill stem. This model was rejected because of the implausible requirement that the soils from the drill stem be accumulated from a source of unirradiated material.The uniformity of various properties of soils provides criteria for defining major stratigraphic intervals in the drill stem which differ from those identified by the Preliminary Examination Team.Neutron fluences measured on shallow and deep soils from all lunar landing sites have been normalized to irradiation in an arbitrary standard chemical environment. We infer from histograms of the normalized fluences that there is a distinct difference in neutron fluence between shallow and deep samples which implies a general vertical stratification of neutron fluence in the lunar regolith.The regolith can be divided into three vertical regions: (1) a well mixed surface layer, ~ 100 g cm-2 thick, with an average fluence of 2.3 x 10 16 n cm-2 , (2) a poorly mixed zone extending from I 00 g cm-2 to at least 500 g cm-2 with an average fluence of 3.5 x 10 16 n cm-2 , and (3) a deep layer of lightly irradiated materials ( < 10 16 n cm-2 ). Analysis of this stratification, using a vertical mixing model, indicates that the probability of mixing to several hundred g cm-2 is comparable to the probability of mixing to several kg cm-2 • This is in contrast to the depth-cratering rate models which have been inferred from crater size frequency distributions using a power law. Alternatively, this discrepancy can be resolved if the true 157 Gd capture rate is t of the value calculated by Lingenfelter et al. (I 972).The most plausible interpretation is that vertical mixing models are not an adequate description of relatively rare deep cratering events which result in significant lateral heterogeneity and addition of unirradiated material to the lunar surface.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.