Protein dynamics and related conformational changes are essential for their function but difficult to characterise and interpret. Amino acids in a protein behave according to their local energy landscape, which is determined by their local structural context and environmental conditions. The lowest energy state for a given residue can correspond to sharply defined conformations,e.g., in a stable helix, or can cover a wide range of conformations,e.g., in intrinsically disordered regions. A good definition of such low energy states is therefore important to describe the behavior of a residue and how it changes with its environment.We propose a data-driven probabilistic definition of six low energy conformational states typically accessible for amino acid residues in proteins. This definition is based on solution NMR information of 1,414 proteins through a combined analysis of structure ensembles with interpreted chemical shifts. We further introduce a conformational state variability parameter that captures, based on an ensemble of protein structures from molecular dynamics or other methods, how often a residue moves between these conformational states. The approach enables a different perspective on the conformational behavior of proteins that is complementary to their static interpretation from single structure models.

Traditionally, our understanding of how proteins operate and how evolution shapes them is based on two main data sources: the overall protein fold and the protein amino acid sequence. However, a significant part of the proteome shows highly dynamic and/or structurally ambiguous behavior, which cannot be correctly represented by the traditional fixed set of static coordinates. Representing such protein behaviors remains challenging and necessarily involves a complex interpretation of conformational states, including probabilistic descriptions. Relating protein dynamics and multiple conformations to their function as well as their physiological context (e.g., post-translational modifications and subcellular localization), therefore, remains elusive for much of the proteome, with studies to investigate the effect of protein dynamics relying heavily on computational models. We here investigate the possibility of delineating three classes of protein conformational behavior: order, disorder, and ambiguity. These definitions are explored based on three different datasets, using interpretable machine learning from a set of features, from AlphaFold2 to sequence-based predictions, to understand the overlap and differences between these datasets. This forms the basis for a discussion on the current limitations in describing the behavior of dynamic and ambiguous proteins.

Inactive rhodopsin can absorb photons, which induces different structural transitions that finally activate rhodopsin. We have examined the change in spatial configurations and physicochemical factors that result during the transition mechanism from the inactive to the active rhodopsin state via intermediates. During the activation process, many existing atomic contacts are disrupted, and new ones are formed. This is related to the movement of Helix 5, which tilts away from Helix 3 in the intermediate state in lumirhodopsin and moves closer to Helix 3 again in the active state. Similar patterns of changing atomic contacts are observed between Helices 3 and 5 of the adenosine and neurotensin receptors. In addition, residues 220–238 of rhodopsin, which are disordered in the inactive state, fold in the active state before binding to the Gα, where it catalyzes GDP/GTP exchange on the Gα subunit. Finally, molecular dynamics simulations in the membrane environment revealed that the arrestin binding region adopts a more flexible extended conformation upon phosphorylation, likely promoting arrestin binding and inactivation. In summary, our results provide additional structural understanding of specific rhodopsin activation which might be relevant to other Class A G protein‐coupled receptor proteins.