An analytical isoelectric focussing technique has been developed to distinguish between different groups of R-plasmid-mediated trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductases. Those mediated by the R-plasmids R483 and R721, which are type I dihydrofolate reductases have isoelectric point (PI) values of 6.4 whereas those mediated by the R-plasmids R67bis and R27, which are type I1 enzymes, have PI values of 5.5. There has been some confusion as to the classification of the dihydrofolate reductases mediated by R-plasmids R388 and R751; however, our studies indicate that the one mediated by R388 is a type I1 enzyme, having a PI value of 5.5, whereas the one mediated by R751 is different from both the type I and type I1 enzymes having a PI value of 7.2. The differences in PI value of these three groups of trimethoprim-resistant enzymes were confirmed by DEAEcellulose chromatography at pH 8.5 where it was found that the type I enzymes were eluted with a different concentration of NaCl than were the type I1 enzymes including that mediated by R388, whereas the enzyme mediated by R751 did not bind to the DEAE-cellulose at this pH.A 'scale-down' technique was developed for analytical isoelectric focussing and was used to study the dihydrofolate reductases mediated by ten R-plasmids present in trimethoprim-resistant Escherichiu coli strains isolated from pigs. All these R-plasmids coded for type I enzymes and all also coded for resistance to streptomycin, indicating that the trimethoprim-resistance gene(s) were present on a transposon similar to Tn7.Bacteria resist trimethoprim when they posses R-plasmids that mediate the production of trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) enzymes, thus allowing the cell to by-pass the action of the drug on the chromosomal trimethoprim-sensitive DHFR [I]. Pattishall et al. [2] differentiated between two groups of these resistant DHFRs (type I and 11) on the basis of the sensitivity of the enzymes to inhibitors, with type I1 being more resistant than type I enzymes. On this basis all the DHFRs studied by Amyes and Smith [3] appeared to be of type I ; however, using this criterion Tennhammar-Ekman and Skold [4] found one of the DHFRs studied by Amyes and Smith [3], that mediated by R-plasmid R388 which was the first R-plasmid-mediated trimethoprim-resistant DHFR to be discovered and characterized [1,5] Abbreviations. R-plasmids, resistance plasrnids; I D 5~, dose giving 50% inhibition; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; PI, isoelectric point; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.Enzyme. Dihydrofolate reductase or 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate-NADP+ oxidoreductase (EC 1.5.1.3).Triviul Name. Trimethoprim, 2,4-diamino-5-(3', 4', 5'-trirnethoxybenzy1)-pyrimidine.Using these criteria it was concluded that the DHFRs mediated by both plasmids R388 and R751 were type I1 enzymes [6].Thus there appears to be some confusion as to the classification of these enzymes, with that mediated by R388 being classified as a type I [3] or as a type I1 [4,6] enzyme and that med...