Although the construct of psychopathy is related to community violence and recidivism in various populations, empirical evidence suggests that its association with institutional aggression is weak at best. The current study examined, via both variable-level and group-level analyses, the relationship between standard violence risk instruments, which included a measure of psychopathy, and institutional violence. Additionally, the incremental validity of dynamic risk factors also was examined. The results suggest that PCL-R was only weakly related to institutional aggression and only then when the behavioral (Factor 2) aspects of the construct were examined. The clinical and risk management scales on the HCR-20, impulsivity, anger, and psychiatric symptoms all were useful in identifying patients at risk for exhibiting institutional aggression. These data suggest that factors other than psychopathy, including dynamic risk factors, may be most useful in identifying forensic patients at higher risk for exhibiting aggression.
Numerous studies suggest that discrimination is associated with poor physical and mental health outcomes. Whereas the cardiovascular system has been extensively studied as a potential pathway linking discrimination with disease, the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis remains understudied. We conducted a systematic review of research on discrimination and related constructs as predictors and correlates of HPA axis activity. Twenty seven studies (10 experimental, 17 observational) met inclusion criteria. Studies suggest that discrimination is associated with alterations in HPA axis activity and that the direction of this association depends on the timing and chronicity of the discrimination experience. There is also evidence of important modulating variables (race, socioeconomic status) and contextual confounders (emotional, situational) that warrant further study. Accounting for the HPA axis in addition to the cardiovascular system will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the biobehavioral pathways contributing to physical and mental health inequities related to discrimination.
Actuarial violence risk assessments, many of which include the construct of psychopathy, have been shown to be superior to clinical judgment in the prediction of long-term risk of community violence and recidivism. While these instruments initially appeared to provide similarly accurate judgments of risk of institutional aggression, recent research has indicated that such assessments may be less robust in this setting. One explanation may lie in the types of aggression most frequently observed in each setting. Impulsive (or reactive/affective) is the type of physical aggression most commonly exhibited in psychiatric facilities. This research examines the relationship between risk assessments and aggression in an inpatient forensic setting, with such aggression categorized as impulsive, predatory or psychotic aggression. Consistent with previous research, impulsive aggression was the most frequent type observed (58%). Anger (as measured by the Novaco Anger Scale) and clinical issues (as measured by the HCR-20) were most associated with impulsive aggression, with AUC values of .73 and .71 respectively. In contrast, anger and psychopathy (as measured by the PCL-R) were more associated with predatory aggression, with AUC values of .95 and .84 respectively. Psychotic symptoms were highly associated with psychotically motivated aggression (AUC=.90). These results suggest that traditional violence risk assessments may have limited utility in predicting aggression in an institutional setting and that psychiatric symptoms and heightened affect are more relevant.
Objectives: The aim was to characterize linezolid population pharmacokinetics in plasma and interstitial space fluid of subcutaneous adipose tissue (target site) of obese compared with non-obese patients and to determine dosing regimens enabling adequate therapy using Monte Carlo simulations. Methods: In this prospective, parallel group, open-label, controlled, single-centre trial, 30 surgery patients (15 obese, 15 non-obese) received 600 mg of intravenous linezolid. A population pharmacokinetic analysis characterizing plasma and microdialysis-derived target site pharmacokinetics was followed by Monte Carlo simulations using twice/thrice daily 600e1200 mg short-term and extended infusions of linezolid. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment for time and exposure-related indices.Results: In the model, lean body weight and obesity status largely explained between-patient variability in linezolid PK parameters (12.0e44.9%). Both factors caused lower area under the concentrationetime curve in typical obese patients in plasma (e20.4%, 95% CI e22.0% to e15.9%) and at target-site (e37.7%, 95% CI e47.1% to e24.2%) compared with non-obese patients. Probability of target attainment showed improvement with increasing linezolid doses. Depending on lean body weight, adequate therapy was partially attained for 900-and 1200-mg linezolid doses and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) 2 mg/L (probability of target attainment 62.5e100%) but could not be reached for MIC ¼ 4 mg/L (probability of target attainment 82.3%). Additionally, lower linezolid distribution into the target site in obese patients as described above might compromise the plasma-based probability of target attainment analysis. Discussion: This analysis revealed risks of linezolid underdosing in empirical antibiotic therapy of most resistant bacteria for obese and non-obese patients. Doubling the standard dose is associated with adequate probability of target attainment throughout most body masses for MIC 2 mg/L. Further clinical studies with adjusted dosing regimens in for example intensive care patients are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.