Elsevier Vernet, N.; Ruiz, E.; Advani, S.; Alms, JB.; Aubert, M.; Barburski, M.; Barari, B.... (2014) Abstract:In this second international permeability benchmark, the in-plane permeability values of a carbon fabric were determined by 12 participants worldwide. One other participant also investigated the deformation of this fabric. The aim of this work was to obtain comparable results in order to make a step towards standardization of permeability measurements of fibrous reinforcements. The procedures used by most participants were according to the guidelines defined for this exercise after the first benchmark. Unidirectional injections in three in-plane directions of the fabric were conducted to determine the unsaturated in-plane permeability tensor. Parameters such as fiber volume fraction, injection pressure and fluid viscosity have been fixed in order to minimize sources of scatter. The comparison of the results from each participant was encouraging. The scatter between data obtained while respecting the test guidelines was close to the scatter of the setups themselves. A slightly 2 higher dispersion was observed when some parameters differed from the recommendations.Overall, a good correlation is observed between all the results of this exercise.

Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated injection method. 19 participants using 20 systems characterized a non-crimp and a woven fabric at three different fiber volume contents, using a commercially available silicone oil as impregnating fluid. They followed a detailed characterization procedure and also completed a questionnaire on their setup and analysis methods. Excluding outliers (2 of 20), the average coefficient of variation (c v) between the participant's results was 32% and 44% (non-crimp and woven fabric), while the average c v for individual participants was 8% and 12%, respectively. This indicates statistically significant variations between the measurement systems. Cavity deformation was identified as a major influence, besides fluid pressure/viscosity measurement, textile variations, and data analysis.

No abstract

No abstract