Objective-To compare postoperative collaborative care between orthopaedic surgeons and physicians in geriatric medicine with routine orthopaedic care in elderly women with proximal femoral fracture.Design-Exclusion of patients dying before fit enough to enter trial, those with pathological fractures, those likely to be discharged within seven days of entering the trial, and those remaining unfit for transfer to a peripheral hospital. Remainder allocated to two groups: treatment group and control group.Setting-District hospital acute admission ward and rehabilitation ward.Patients-144 sequentially admitted elderly women with proximal fracture of the femur; 36 excluded on above criteria and remainder entered into trial.Intervention-Both treatment and control groups (n=54 in each) received physiotherapy and other services. The treatment group also received thrice weekly supervision by a geriatrician.End points-Physical independence, residence after discharge, and length of hospital stay.Measurements and main results-At discharge significantly more patients in treatment group were independent in terms of activities of daily living than controls (41 v 25) and their median stay was 24 days (range 8-197) compared with 41 (9-365) (95% confidence intervals for difference 2 to 25). Significantly fewer treatment patients were discharged to institutional care (10% v 32%; 95% confidence interval for difference 6% to 37%) and more to their own homes (63% v 38%; 95% confidence interval for difference 6% to 44%). These beneficial effects were consistent across a range of ages and mental states.Conclusions-Both hospital and patient benefited when postoperative rehabilitation was provided in a setting specialising in such care for elderly patients with trauma.
We investigated the use of amniocentesis performed at eight to 14 weeks' gestation as a possible alternative to chorionic villus sampling. Patients, methods, and results Samples of amniotic fluid were taken from 40 gestation, and the mean time to the cells being harvested was 12 6 days. In contrast only 17 (68%) of the 25 samples taken at eight to 11 weeks yielded a result. One sample taken at 13 weeks' gestation yielded a female karyotype, whereas the fetal parts revealed a male karyotype; the sample was subsequently identified as maternal urine. The mean volume of amniotic fluid obtained was 13 9 ml (range 1-40 ml). CommentAll 15 samples taken at 12-14 weeks' gestation yielded a result. The mean time to cells being harvested in this group (12-6 days) compared favourably with the current mean of 11 days for the samples obtained routinely at [16][17][18][19] weeks that are processed by our laboratory. Culture of all the 5 ml aliquots obtained at 12-14 weeks was successful. Thus a 10 ml sample would provide two cultures, which are necessary for the interpretation of equivocal results and in case of microbial infection.In one case, a urine sample was obtained at 13 weeks' gestation from an obese patient in whom imaging was poor. In a clinical environment sampling would not have been attempted, and this patient would have been recalled later.Our results show that amniocentesis from as early as 12 weeks' gestation can provide sufficient material for cytogenetic diagnosis and could be offered as an alternative to current methods of prenatal diagnosis. Furthermore, the procedure could be carried out by doctors already familiar with the technique, using existing resources. Patients must, however, be advised that the risks of this procedure are unknown. Preliminary reports from the United States suggest that early amniocentesis is safer than chorionic villus sampling.24 Further evaluation, preferably by means of a randomised trial, is urgently needed. We are continuing our investigation of amniocentesis before 12 weeks with the aim of bringing the procedure forward into the first trimester of pregnancy.We acknowledge contributions to the study from Mr N Fisk, Mr P Reginald, Mr M Michel, and Mrs R Rebello.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.