Motor skill learning is associated with profound changes in brain activation patterns over time. Associative and rostral premotor cortical and subcortical regions are mostly recruited during the early phase of explicit motor learning, while sensorimotor regions may increase their activity during the late learning phases. Distinct brain networks are therefore engaged during the early and late phases of motor skill learning. How these regions interact with one another and how information is transferred from one circuit to the other has been less extensively studied. In this study, we used functional MRI (fMRI) at 3T to follow the changes in functional connectivity in the associative/ premotor and the sensorimotor networks, during extended practice (four weeks) of an explicitly known sequence of finger movements. Evolution of functional connectivity was assessed using integration, a measure that quantifies the total amout of interaction within a network. When comparing the integration associated with a complex finger movement sequence to that associated with a simple sequence, we observed two patterns of decrease during the four weeks of practice. One was not specific as it was observed for all sequences, whereas a specific decrease was observed only for the execution of the learned sequence. This second decrease was a consequence of a relative decrease in associative/premotor network integration, together with a relative increase in betweennetwork integration. These findings are in line with the hypothesis that information is transferred from the associative/premotor circuit to the sensorimotor circuit during the course of motor learning.
The mental consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the strict lockdown measures implemented by governments world-wide to fight it are currently unknown. We performed an online survey study in Switzerland and analyzed data acquired during confinement (wave 1) and during partial lifting of measures (partial deconfinement) (wave 2). Wave 1: Data from over 10’000 individuals living in Switzerland were collected between April 6 and 8, 2020, starting 3 weeks after the beginning of confinement. While 24.4% of the participants reported no change in stress levels, 49.6% of the participants reported an increase in stress levels during confinement as compared to the time before the COVID-19 pandemic. We identified several potential sources for people feeling more stressed during confinement, such as the burden related to changes at work or school, problems with childcare or not being able to spend more time with others. The changes in stress levels were highly correlated with changes in depressive symptoms. 57% of the participants reported an increase in depressive symptoms. Further, the prevalence of moderately severe or severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥ 15) increased from 3.4% before the COVID-19 pandemic to 9.1% during confinement. Interestingly, 26% of participants showed a decrease in stress level during confinement, suggesting that for those individuals the confinement involved a reduction of stressors and/or resulted in more time for recovery. Finally, we identified several behaviors amenable to change that were related to a reduced increase in stress level and depressive symptoms during confinement. Wave 2: Data from over 10’000 individuals living in Switzerland were collected between May 11 and June 1, 2020 during partial deconfinement. As for wave 1, we observed diverse reactions with regard to stress levels: While 28% of the participants reported no change in stress levels, 40% of the participants reported an increase in stress levels during partial deconfinement as compared to the time before the COVID-19 pandemic. We identified similar sources for people feeling more stressed as during confinement and the changes in stress levels were highly correlated with changes in depressive symptoms. 49.5% of the participants reported an increase in depressive symptoms. Further, the prevalence of moderately severe or severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥ 15) remained elevated with a prevalence rate of 11.7%. With regard to changeable behaviors during the pandemic, we found (as in wave 1) that spending more time pursuing new projects, spending more time pursuing hobbies at home, and light physical exercise were related to less stress increase.A comparison between the two waves indicated that while the waves did not substantially differ in the distributions of changes in stress levels or depressive symptoms, they did differ with regard to the distribution of anxiety ratings. Specifically, anxiety levels decreased from wave 1 to wave 2. Finally, we identified risk and resilience factors with regard to the development of depressive symptoms (present in both waves): A history of a prior psychiatric disorder was a risk factor for developing moderately severe or severe depressive symptoms during the pandemic. In a resilient group of people who had none or only minimal depressive symptoms before and during the pandemic, older people (≥ 55 years), men and individuals with no history of prior psychiatric disorder were overrepresented. Thus, advanced age, male gender and the absence of prior psychiatric disorder were identified as resilience factors.
Summary Working memory, the capacity of actively maintaining task-relevant information during a cognitive task, is a heritable trait. Working memory deficits are characteristic for many psychiatric disorders. We performed genome-wide gene-set enrichment analyses in multiple independent data sets of young and aged cognitively healthy subjects (n = 2’824), and in a large schizophrenia case-control sample (n = 32’143). The voltage-gated cation channel activity gene-set, consisting of genes related to neuronal excitability, was robustly linked to performance in working memory-related tasks across ages, and to schizophrenia. Functional brain imaging in 707 healthy participants linked this gene-set also to working memory-related activity in the parietal cortex and the cerebellum. Gene-set analyses may help to dissect the molecular underpinnings of cognitive dimensions, brain activity and psychopathology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.