Introduction Wound care compliance is a critical component in the success of treating burns in the outpatient setting. Patients and caregivers are educated with demonstration and written materials which have demonstrated a 24-hour retention rate of 30% and 10% respectively. This can leave the patient at higher risk for infection, increased pain from suboptimal dressings, and feelings of frustration. Research has shown that visual learners make up 65% of the population, with auditory learners at 30%, and tactile learners at 5%. We assessed that a combination of demonstration and visual aids could better assist different learning styles and improve wound care compliance. Our study goal was to assess the efficacy of the visual aids component through new patient encounters in the emergency department and outpatient setting using a six-question survey at subsequent encounters. Methods The study design is a prospective analysis with comparison to historical controls. Visual aids were designed by the burn physician assistants with assistance at an ABA-verified burn center. We created four double-sided cards made out of a water-resistant synthetic paper, with one for each of our most used dressings. The content of the cards included one of the following: bacitracin/fine mesh gauze with bismuth tribromophenate, bacitracin with low-adherent acetate gauze, silver nylon dressings, and silver foam dressings. Each card contains moulage wounds, step-by-step, and corresponding written instructions at a 4th grade education reading level. These visual aids were given to patients being discharged from the emergency department, or to new patients in the burn clinic. A six-question survey was administered at one week follow-up encounters with a scale of 1-10 (one being least helpful, and ten being the most helpful) assessing patients understanding of burn wound care and compliance. Compliance rates were abstracted from historical controls with similar burn wound severity. Results Limited data is available at the time of submission as the study is currently in-progress and anticipated to be completed by March 2021. We will be using descriptive statistics and comparative analysis to evaluate the results. Conclusions Patients initial feedback has been overall positive with a corresponding compliance rate that is successful. Our patients verbalized their approval, with multiple patients stating that they plan to keep the wound care card for any burn injuries that might occur in the future. Additional research is needed to examine the impact of combined demonstration, tactile, and auditory learning aids. In addition, we plan to further expand our engagement effort to include similar wound care cards for pediatric patients as well as language alternative cards to meet our surrounding community's needs.

Introduction Burn care (BC) remains a highly specialized and resource intensive specialty with only 2% of hospitals featuring a burn center and less than 1% of graduating general surgery and plastic surgery residents pursing a burn fellowship each year. Access to specialized care is further complicated by burn wound assessment (BWA) which is commonly performed visually without adjunctive devices. To help clinicians make more accurate assessments and potentially reduce delays in transfer or treatment, a new non-invasive imaging device for BWA is being developed using visible and non-visible wavelengths of light with machine learning algorithms. Our goal was to assess the potential reduced treatment delay (RTD) and associated financial savings by implementing such a device using our burn center’s historical data. Methods The study was an IRB-approved, retrospective review of admissions from 07/01/2018 through 06/30/2019. Inclusion criteria: thermal, chemical, contact, or electrical mechanism of injury, >15 years of age requiring excision, and length of stay >72 hours. Inclusion data included: presence/absence of concomitant trauma, day of surgery, day of admission, day of electronic order entry for case request, and length of stay per percent total body surface area (LOS%TBSA). RTD was defined starting >48 hours after injury daily until electronic order entry for surgical case request. Reduced costs were calculated per day from prior studies ranging $3,000 to $5,100/day. Results A total of 109 patients were included. 29 patients had case requests placed within 48 hours of admission. Of the remaining 80 patients, a potential of 398 days would have been saved had a novel BWA adjunctive imaging devices aided surgeon to requests earlier surgical intervention. Overall savings from reduced length of stay range from $1,194,000 to $2,029,800 dollars. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that should a BWA technology with accuracy 48 hours after injury be developed, even burn centers with 24-hour access to operating rooms can reduce treatment delays. The study does not look at additional cost savings offered by reduced emergent transfers or admissions which offer additional intrigue and promise.