A problem of overprescribing of hypnotic medication ('sleeping tablets') was identified and quantified within a department of health care for older people in a district general hospital. Data on the volume of prescribing were obtained from computerized pharmacy records, and this information was supplemented by a retrospective survey of case notes of 100 patients. Sixty per cent of patients were prescribed a hypnotic at some stage during their hospital stay. Twelve per cent were prescribed a sleeping tablet on admission on an 'as required' basis but never took this medication, suggesting that such prescribing was becoming routine. As part of an ongoing pharmacy audit within the department, a policy was implemented to try to improve prescribing habits. Following this, hypnotic prescribing fell, with the average monthly number of sleeping tablets prescribed falling from 2392 to 734. A further survey of 100 case notes showed overall prescribing had fallen to 25%, although 2% were still prescribed a hypnotic on admission but never took it.

, as new guidelines and a proforma were introduced. For the first audit, data were collected from 75 departmental discharges. Following introduction of a proforma, six point prevalence audits were performed of all elderly care inpatients. Consultant documentation improved from 27/75 (36%) to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 133/140 (95%), 96/119 (81%), 148/157 (94%) and 167/169 (98%) in audits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively. The percentages of decisions that were Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) were 64% 72%, 45%, 68% and 62% in audits 3 to 7 respectively. For audit 5 our guidelines required discussion with patient before making a DNAR order, whereas the guidelines applicable for the other audits did not stipulate discussion. The fall in documentation rates and proportion of CPR decisions that were DNAR in audit 5 were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, diagnosis, cognitive function or disability between patients in those audits (3-7) when these parameters were recorded. Introducing a proforma significantly improved CPR decision documentation. Obligatory discussion with a patient before issuing a DNAR order was associated with a fall in documentation of decisions.

No abstract

A day hospital sister was suspended and given afinalformal warningfor obeying the request of her consultant to give a patient tranquilising medication in disguise. Though a disciplinary inquiry exonerated the consultant, the action on the nurse has not been rescinded. This case questions the authority of the multidisciplinary team and the role of nursing managers. We asked two geriatricians andforensic scientists to comment on the case.

No abstract