Alzheimer's disease (AD) is accompanied by memory loss due to neuronal cell death caused by toxic amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) aggregates. In the healthy brain, a group of amyloid-degrading enzymes including neprilysin (NEP) maintain Aβ levels at physiologically low concentrations but, with age and under some pathological conditions, expression and activity of these enzymes decline predisposing to late-onset AD. Hence, up-regulation of NEP might be a viable strategy for prevention of Aβ accumulation and development of the disease. As we have recently shown, inhibitors of histone deacetylases, in particular, valproic acid (VA), were capable of up-regulating NEP expression and activity in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell lines characterised by very low levels of NEP. In the present study, analysing the effect of i.p. injections of VA to rats, we have observed up-regulation of expression and activity of NEP in rat brain structures, in particular, in the hippocampus. This effect was brain region- and age-specific. Administration of VA has also restored NEP activity and memory deficit in adult rats caused by prenatal hypoxia. This suggests that VA and more specific HDAC inhibitors can be considered as potential pharmaceutical agents for up-regulation of NEP activity and improvement of cognitive functions of ageing brain.

Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the ‘3Rs’), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, ‘cultures of care’, harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.

Despite the development of powerful molecular biological techniques and technologies, studies involving research animals remain a key component of discovery biology, and in the discovery and development of new medicines. In 1959, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) were developed to provide a framework to ensure animal research was undertaken as humanely as possible. Sixty years since their inception, the extent to which the 3Rs have been adopted and implemented by the global scientific and medical research communities has unfortunately been slow and patchy. However, this situation is changing rapidly as awareness increases, not only of the 3Rs themselves, but of the impact of animal welfare on the reproducibility, reliability and translatability of data from animal studies.

SUMMARY BackgroundGastric acid has an important pathophysiological role in human beings. Numerous methods have been evaluated over the years in an attempt to measure gastric acid and stomach acidity, to study the role of gastric acid in gastrointestinal diseases in humans and to evaluate the effects of acid suppressing drugs.

1 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) was applied by microiontophoresis in the vicinity of identified sympathetic preganglionic neurones in the upper thoracic spinal cord of the rat, in vivo. 2 Sympathetic preganglionic neurones responded in one of three ways to 5-HT: by (a) excitation (76%), (b) inhibition (4%) or (c) in a biphasic manner (5%). 3 The excitatory responses evoked by 5-HT were mimicked by 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) and a-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (a-Me-5-HT). The inhibitory and biphasic responses evoked by 5-HT were mimicked by 2-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (2-Me-5-HT). The observed responses evoked by 5-HT and selective agonists may be different on the same cell. In several instances a single neurone excited by one agonist was inhibited by another agonist. 4 The 5-HT2-receptor antagonists, ketanserin and LY 53857, failed to abolish selectively the excitatory responses evoked by 5-HT and a-Me-5-HT, when applied by microiontophoresis. The antagonists nonselectively reduced the excitatory responses evoked by 5-HT, 5-CT, a-Me-5-HT, D,L-homocysteic acid (DLH) and noradrenaline (NA). A reduction in synaptically evoked activity was also observed. 5 The 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, ICS 205-930, failed to abolish the inhibitory responses evoked by 5-HT.6 It was concluded that the excitatory responses evoked by 5-HT are mediated by a receptor that is neither 5-HT2 or 5-HT3, but shows similarities to the 5-HT1-like receptor profile. The inhibitory actions of 5-HT are mimicked by 2-Me-5-HT, but the receptor is not 5-HT3, or 5-HT1-like or 5-HT2.