No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background When preparing dried blood spots (DBSs), haematocrit (Hct) can affect the ability of the blood to spread through the filter paper, thus resulting in varying quantities of sample being measured when fixed subpunches of the DBSs are taken. It may be important to predict the sample Hct to correct volume differences. Methods Blood (10  µL) was applied to Perkin Elmer 226® paper. The samples ( n = 165) were allowed to dry for 24 h, and the entire blood spots were cut out. Subpunch analysis was also performed on blood spots prepared from 75  µL EDTA blood, taking 6 mm subpunches centrally and peripherally from the spots ( n = 59). The spots were eluted with 100  µL water, and a 10  µL aliquot of lysate was added to sulfolyser reagent (80  µL) in a microtitre plate. Hb was measured at 550 nm using an ELISA plate reader. DBS samples were compared against blood samples measured on a routine Sysmex XN-9000 analyser. Results The Passing and Bablock regression showed Hct (DBS-predicted) = 0.99 Hct (Sysmex) -0.02, R= 0.87. Intra-assay imprecision measured at Hct values of 0.27, 0.40 and 0.52, gave CVs of 4.1%, 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Inter-assay imprecision showed CVs of 6.2%, 5.2% and 4.2%, respectively. DBS samples were stable for up to two days at 60℃, one month at room temperature and six months at 4℃. Conclusion This method provides a simple and fast estimation of predicted Hct in dried blood spots.