Four cases of tubular colonic duplication are reported and 53 more are reviewed from 1876-1981 literature. Eighty percent of these patients had other anomalies, most notably genital and bladder duplications. Females outnumbered the males 37 to 20. Fifty per cent of patients of either sex had some form of fistulous communication. In no one was the anomaly incompatible with life. Based on the anatomy of distal ends of duplicated colon, the patients are divided in five groups, for each of which the incidence and nature of concomitant anomalies are tabulated. Because of their anatomic complexity, most patients with colonic duplication require clinical evaluation by multiple subspecialists. We have also suggested the sequence and extent to which they should be evaluated by radiologists.
Eleven infants had echogenic stripes in the basal ganglia at the location of the lenticulostriate arteries, seen by head ultrasound. Eight patients had proven infection with rubella (2 patients), cytomegalovirus (2 patients), syphilis (1 patient) or bacterial meningitis (3 patients). Two had probable intrauterine infection clinically, but the organism could not be identified; one had trisomy 13. A recent report correlated these echogenic stripes in patients with viral and syphilitic intracranial infection with pathologically proven mineralizing vasculopathy. Our group manifests a wider range of intracerebral infection associated with this finding. Duplex sonography performed in four infants showed these stripes in vivo to be arteries in the basal ganglia. The lenticulostriate arteries are not normally visible by grey scale sonography but their Doppler signal may be elicited in normal children and they are rendered vividly visible by color Doppler. Echogenicity of these vessels is highly suggestive of intracranial infection because it is not encountered normally or in babies with non infectious intracranial disorders except trisomy 13. The prognostic significance of this finding is yet to be determined.
The position of the DJJ, the configuration of the duodenal sweep, the orientation of the mesenteric vessels are all wrong horses to bet on because none of them addresses the fundamental anatomic and embryologic facts. Only the cross-sectional imaging, US, CT and MRI can prove that the D3 is retromesenteric, therefore, excluding malrotation and volvulus. Therefore, demonstrating a retromesenteric duodenum is the reference standard of imaging in the work-up of malrotation, not any other previously published criteria. The US imaging is the most acceptable imaging method for malrotation work-up, in the spirit of ALARA principle and "Image Gently" campaign.
Radiographs of 38 children with Down syndrome (aged 2-3 years) were retrospectively evaluated for hypoplasia of the posterior arch of the C-1 vertebra. The anteroposterior dimensions of the posterior arch of C-1 were measured and compared with those of an age- and sex-matched control group. The posterior arches of C-2 to C-5 were similarly evaluated. Radiographs demonstrated hypoplasia of the posterior arch of C-1 in 26%. This anomaly of C-1 was an isolated event; sagittal diameters of C-2 to C-5 were within normal limits compared with those of the control group and published standards. Because of the known, potentially devastating atlantoaxial dislocation in Down syndrome, the increased prevalence of a second C-1 anomaly causing preexistent narrowing of the vertebral canal is of clinical concern. A hypoplastic posterior arch of C-1 may amplify the risk of spinal cord damage following atlantoaxial subluxation, as the subsequently smaller vertebral canal has less room for dorsal movement of the odontoid process. This potential "double jeopardy" of C-1 vertebral abnormalities should be recognized and assessed on cervical spine screening radiographs in children with Down syndrome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.