In a discrete-trial two-choice conditional discrimination task, pigeons which received food for a correct choice following the presentation of one cue and water for a correct choice following another cue performed better than pigeons which received food and water equally often in both cases when delays of several seconds intervened between the conditional cue and choice stimuli presentations. These results suggest that feedback properties of reinforcer-specific. expectancies cB:n be impor~nt in conditional discrimination learning in pigeons. An additional findmg was that wlld-caught pigeons regularly exhibited a higher percentage of correct choices than domestic subjects.
In a conditioned suppression paradigm, a partially overlapping compound stimulus signaled occurrences of electric shock. That compound CS consisted of 3 min of continuous illumination of the houselight with three discrete 5-sec presentations of a tone superimposed. A .5-sec electric shock was coterminous with each tone presentation. Rats that received this treatment in early conditioning sessions showed considerable recovery from conditioned suppression to the houselight as the experiment progressed. However, the effect was not reversible, and it could not be demonstrated in rats that experienced extensive prior conditioning to the houselight alone. These results are discussed in relation to a hypothesis concerning the modulation of behavioral control exerted by elements of compound stimuli and as they relate to a recent theoretical model for Pavlovian fear conditioning.The hypothesis that contextual stimulus control in certain Pavlovian conditioning situations is modulated by the existence of special CSs that reliably signal US events is suggested by results from two lines of research. One of these lines of research is Seligman's (1968) study of contextual cues as reliable predictors of the absence of electric shock (i.e., as "safety signals"). That research demonstrated that when rats (already trained to press a lever to obtain food) experience signaled electric shock they show reduced baseline response rates in early sessions of the experiment, gradually recover preshock baseline rates, and finally show reduced rates only during CS presentations. Rats for whom electric shocks and CSs are uncorrelated also show reduced baseline response rates in early sessions, but in later sessions of the experiment they evidence no recovery. They remain suppressed in the presence of CSs and contextual stimuli alike. These results indicate that, in a situation where electric shocks occur, the existence of CSs signaling those shocks is a necessary condition for recovery of appetitively reinforced baseline performance in the presence of contextual stimuli alone. When CSs predict shocks, contextual stimuli (in the absence of CSs) come to serve as cues for performance of the baseline response.The second line of research which has produced results suggesting the above hypothesis is that of Hershiser and Trapold (1971). Those investigators examined the preferences of rats given a choice between environments where appetitive reinforcements were either signaled or unsignaled. Since reinforcement consisted of the injection of a sucrose solution directly into the rat's mouth by means of a surgically implanted tube, reinforcers could be delivered completely unsignaled. In those experiments rats came to prefer the environment in which reinforcements were unsignaled.
Understanding prospective students' perceptions of college prices and educational quality can ease some of the strain associated with setting institutional price. This chapter describes how to gather and interpret perceptual data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.