Avian influenza that infects poultry in close proximity to humans is a concern because of its pandemic potential. In 2004, an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza H7N3 occurred in poultry in British Columbia, Canada. Surveillance identified two persons with confirmed avian influenza infection. Symptoms included conjunctivitis and mild influenzalike illness.

Two different severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) vaccine strategies were evaluated for their ability to protect against live SARS coronavirus (CoV) challenge in a murine model of infection. A whole killed (inactivated by b-propiolactone) SARS-CoV vaccine and a combination of two adenovirus-based vectors, one expressing the nucleocapsid (N) and the other expressing the spike (S) protein (collectively designated Ad S/N), were evaluated for the induction of serum neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune responses and their ability to protect against pulmonary SARS-CoV replication. The whole killed virus (WKV) vaccine given subcutaneously to 129S6/SvEv mice was more effective than the Ad S/N vaccine administered either intranasally or intramuscularly in inhibiting SARS-CoV replication in the murine respiratory tract. This protective ability of the WKV vaccine correlated with the induction of high serum neutralizing-antibody titres, but not with cellular immune responses as measured by gamma interferon secretion by mouse splenocytes. Titres of serum neutralizing antibodies induced by the Ad S/N vaccine administered intranasally or intramuscularly were significantly lower than those induced by the WKV vaccine. However, Ad S/N administered intranasally, but not intramuscularly, significantly limited SARS-CoV replication in the lungs. Among the vaccine groups, SARS-CoV-specific IgA was found only in the sera of mice immunized intranasally with Ad S/N, suggesting that mucosal immunity may play a role in protection for the intranasal Ad S/N delivery system. Finally, the sera of vaccinated mice contained antibodies to S, further suggesting a role for this protein in conferring protective immunity against SARS-CoV infection. (Marra et al., 2003;Rota et al., 2003) and by experimental infection of macaques to fulfil Koch's postulates . 0008-1579 G 2006 SGM Printed in Great BritainCurrently, there is no effective treatment for SARS. Prevention through contact-reduction or transmission-blocking measures has been the only means available to modify the devastating impact of this illness. Prevention through vaccination would be an attractive alternative that is less reliant on individual case detection to be effective. No vaccines are currently licensed for any of the human CoVs, but effective vaccines have been produced for some animal CoVs, such as certain strains of Infectious bronchitis virus (poultry), Bovine coronavirus and Canine coronavirus (Cavanagh, 2003;Enjuanes et al., 1995;Pratelli et al., 2003;Saif, 2004;Takamura et al., 2002). Individuals convalescing from SARS develop high titres of neutralizing antibodies (Tan et al., 2004) and the appearance of antibodies coincides with the onset of resolution of SARS pneumonia Woo et al., 2004). Thus, there is some optimism that an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV may also be possible.Coronavirus spike (S) proteins have long been known to be a major determinant in coronavirus pathogenesis, given that this viral protein interacts with cellular receptors as well as con...

Genome sequences of chicken (low pathogenic avian influenza [LPAI] and highly pathogenic avian influenza [HPAI]) and human isolates from a 2004 outbreak of H7N3 avian influenza in Canada showed a novel insertion in the HA0 cleavage site of the human and HPAI isolate. This insertion likely occurred by recombination between the hemagglutination and matrix genes in the LPAI virus.