Background The prefabricated fibula flap is an advanced method of occlusal‐based reconstruction that combines placement of osseointegrated dental implants with prelamination, using a split skin graft on the fibula, weeks prior to the definitive reconstruction. This approach is resource intensive but has several advantages including eliminating the delay from reconstruction to dental rehabilitation. Methods A retrospective cohort study of all prefabricated fibula flaps used for mandible and maxillary reconstruction from 2012 to 2020 was performed. Outcome measures were implant survival, implant utilization and functional dental rehabilitation. Results A total of 17 prefabricated fibula flaps were performed including two analogue and 15 digital plans. There were nine maxillary and eight mandibular reconstructions, of which 11 were primary and seven were secondary. There were no free flap failures. A total of 65 implants were placed (average 3.8, median 3 implants). There was one implant failure at 6 years giving a 1.5% failure rate. There was 91% implant utilization and 94% functional dental rehabilitation. Conclusion The prefabricated fibula flap provides outstanding dental rehabilitation in well‐selected patients.

Reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible incorporating a dental prosthesis supported by dental implants is a complex process but has tremendous benefit to patient rehabilitation following ablative procedures. This study presents a protocol that can be used to aid other institutions to provide the highest standard of reconstruction.

Background Although microvascular free flaps are often used to reconstruct maxillary defects, dentoalveolar rehabilitation is arguably less common despite its importance to midface function and aesthetics. The aim of this study is to review the contemporary management of maxillary defects in a single quaternary referral institution to identify factors that assist or impede dentoalveolar rehabilitation. Methods A retrospective review of maxillary reconstructions performed between February 2017 and December 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics, defect classification, operative techniques, complications and dentoalveolar outcomes were recorded. Results A total of 85 maxillary reconstructions were performed in 73 patients. Of the 64 patients where dental rehabilitation was required, 31 received a functional denture (48%) with 24 (38%) being implant‐retained. Significant predictors of successful rehabilitation included the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP; 86% vs. 25%, p < 0.001), preoperative prosthodontic assessment (82% vs. 21%, p < 0.001), prefabrication (100% vs. 40%, p = 0.002) and use of the zygomatic implant perforator flap technique (100% vs. 39%, p = 0.001). Preoperative prosthodontic consultation was associated with 21‐fold increase in the odds of rehabilitation (odds ratio 20.9, 95% confidence interval 6.54–66.66, p < 0.005). Conclusion Preoperative prosthodontic evaluation, VSP and reconstructive techniques developed to facilitate implant placement are associated with increased dental rehabilitation rates. Despite using an institutional algorithm, functional dentures are frequently prevented by factors including soft tissue constraints, disease recurrence and patient motivation.

No abstract

No abstract