Intravitreal administration of ranibizumab for 2 years prevented vision loss and improved mean visual acuity, with low rates of serious adverse events, in patients with minimally classic or occult (with no classic lesions) choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056836 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Ranibizumab was superior to verteporfin as intravitreal treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration, with low rates of serious ocular adverse events. Treatment improved visual acuity on average at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00061594 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

No abstract

No abstract

on behalf of the HAWK and HARRIER Study Investigators* Purpose: Two similarly designed phase 3 trials (HAWK and HARRIER) compared brolucizumab, a singlechain antibody fragment that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-A, with aflibercept to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).Design: Double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized trials. Participants: Patients (N ¼ 1817) with untreated, active choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye.Intervention: Patients were randomized to intravitreal brolucizumab 3 mg (HAWK only) or 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg. After loading with 3 monthly injections, brolucizumab-treated eyes received an injection every 12 weeks (q12w) and were interval adjusted to every 8 weeks (q8w) if disease activity was present; aflibercept-treated eyes received q8w dosing.Main Outcome Measures: The primary hypothesis was noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to Week 48 (margin: 4 letters). Other key end points included the percentage of patients who maintained q12w dosing through Week 48 and anatomic outcomes.Results: At Week 48, each brolucizumab arm demonstrated noninferiority to aflibercept in BCVA change from baseline (least squares [LS] mean, þ6.6 [6 mg] and þ6.1 [3 mg] letters with brolucizumab vs. þ6.8 letters with aflibercept [HAWK]; þ6.9 [brolucizumab 6 mg] vs. þ7.6 [aflibercept] letters [HARRIER]; P < 0.001 for each comparison). Greater than 50% of brolucizumab 6 mgetreated eyes were maintained on q12w dosing through Week 48 (56% [HAWK] and 51% [HARRIER]). At Week 16, after identical treatment exposure, fewer brolucizumab 6 mgetreated eyes had disease activity versus aflibercept in HAWK (24.0% vs. 34.5%; P ¼ 0.001) and HARRIER (22.7% vs. 32.2%; P ¼ 0.002). Greater central subfield thickness reductions from baseline to Week 48 were observed with brolucizumab 6 mg versus aflibercept in HAWK (LS mean À172.8 mm vs. À143.7 mm; P ¼ 0.001) and HARRIER (LS mean À193.8 mm vs. À143.9 mm; P < 0.001). Anatomic retinal fluid outcomes favored brolucizumab over aflibercept. Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar with brolucizumab and aflibercept.Conclusions: Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in visual function at Week 48, and >50% of brolucizumab 6 mgetreated eyes were maintained on q12w dosing interval through Week 48. Anatomic outcomes favored brolucizumab over aflibercept. Overall safety with brolucizumab was similar to aflibercept (Clin-icalTrials.gov; NCT02307682, NCT02434328).