We examined the patient and physician characteristics related to the use and yield of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) at a tertiary academic hospital emergency department (ED). A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted on 835 consecutive ED patients with suspected PE who underwent CTPA. Radiology report data were extracted from our institution's RIS PACS software (Syngo Imaging, Siemens) based on a targeted search of all CTPA reports from 2010 to 2012. Utilization and PE positivity rates of CTPA were calculated and correlated with patient characteristics including age and gender, as well as emergency physician (EP) characteristics including gender, years in practice, and training certification. Acute PE was diagnosed in 17.8 % of patients. A further 32.9 % of the scans were negative for PE but had other clinically significant findings. We found higher utilization rates in female and older patients (p < 0.001), however, without corresponding differences in PE positivity rates compared to their male and younger counterparts. There was a high inter-physician variation in CTPA utilization rate (range 0.21-0.77 scans per 100 patients seen) and PE positivity rate (range 6.7-38.9 %). However, neither rates correlated with EP years of experience (p > 0.15 with cut-offs at 5, 10, and 20 years post-residency), gender (p = 0.59), or training certification (p = 0.56 between EPs certified by the 5-year program of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada versus the 3-year program of the College of Family Physicians of Canada). Our study demonstrated considerable inter-physician variability in the utilization and PE positivity rates of CTPA. These results suggest an opportunity for a more standardized approach to the use of CTPA among EPs at our institution.

No abstract

ObjectivesEmergency department (ED) access block, the inability to provide timely care for high acuity patients, is the leading safety concern in First World EDs. The main cause of ED access block ishospital access blockwith prolonged boarding of inpatients in emergency stretchers. Cumulative emergency access gap, the product of the number of arriving high acuity patients and their average delay to reach a care space, is a novel access measure that provides a facility-level estimate of total emergency care delays. Many health leaders believe these delays are too large to be solved without substantial increases in hospital capacity. Our objective was to quantify cumulative emergency access blocks (the problem) as a fraction of inpatient capacity (the potential solution) at a large sample of Canadian hospitals.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we collated 2015 administrative data from 25 Canadian hospitals summarizing patient inflow and delays to ED care space. Cumulative access gap for high acuity patients was calculated by multiplying the number of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) 1-3 patients by their average delay to reach a care space. We compared cumulative ED access gap to available inpatient bed hours to estimate fractional access gap.ResultsStudy sites included 16 tertiary and 9 community EDs in 12 cities, representing 1.79 million patient visits. Median ED census (interquartile range) was 66,300 visits per year (58,700-80,600). High acuity patients accounted for 70.7% of visits (60.9%-79.0%). The mean (SD) cumulative ED access gap was 46,000 stretcher hours per site per year (± 19,900), which was 1.14% (± 0.45%) of inpatient capacity.ConclusionED access gaps are large and jeopardize care for high acuity patients, but they are small relative to hospital operating capacity. If access block were viewed as a “whole hospital” problem, capacity or efficiency improvements in the range of 1% to 3% could profoundly mitigate emergency care delays.