The prostacyclin analogues, iloprost and treprostinil are extensively used in treating pulmonary hypertension. Their binding profile and corresponding biochemical cellular responses on human prostanoid receptors expressed in cell lines, have now been compared. Iloprost had high binding affinity for EP1 and IP receptors (Ki 1.1 and 3.9 nM, respectively), low affinity for FP, EP3 or EP4 receptors, and very low affinity for EP2, DP1 or TP receptors. By contrast, treprostinil had high affinity for the DP1, EP2 and IP receptors (Ki 4.4, 3.6 and 32 nM, respectively), low affinity for EP1 and EP4 receptors and even lower affinity for EP3, FP and TP receptors. In functional assays, iloprost had similar high activity in elevating cyclic AMP levels in cells expressing the human IP receptor and stimulating calcium influx in cells expressing EP1 receptors (EC50 0.37 and 0.3 nM, respectively) with the rank order of activity on the other receptors comparable to the binding assays. As with binding studies, treprostinil elevated cyclic AMP with a similar high potency in cells expressing DP1, IP and EP2 receptors (EC50 0.6, 1.9 and 6.2 nM, respectively), but had low activity at the other receptors. Activation of IP, DP1 and EP2 receptors, as with treprostinil, can all result in vasodilatation of human pulmonary arteries. However, activation of EP1 receptors can provoke vasoconstriction, and hence may offset the IP-receptor mediated vasodilator effects of iloprost. Treprostinil may therefore differ from iloprost in its overall beneficial pulmonary vasorelaxant profile and other pharmacological actions, especially in diseases where the IP receptor is down-regulated.
trans-10,11-Dihydroxy-5,6,6a,7,8,12b-hexahydrobenzo[a]phenan thridine (4a, dihydrexidine) has been found to be a highly potent and selective agonist of the dopamine D1 receptor in rat brain. Dihydrexidine had an EC50 of approximately 70 nM in activating dopamine-sensitive rat striatal adenylate cyclase and a maximal stimulation equal to or slightly greater than that produced by dopamine. Dihydrexidine had an IC50 of 12 nM in competing for [3H]SCH23390 (1a) binding sites in rat striatal homogenate, and of 120 nM versus [3H]spiperone. These data demonstrate that dihydroxidine has about ten-fold selectivity for D1/D2 receptors. More importantly, however, is the fact that dihydrexidine is a full agonist. Previously available agents, such as SKF38393 (1b), while being somewhat more selective for the D1 receptor, are only partial agonists. The isomeric cis-dihydroxybenzo[a]-phenanthridine neither stimulated cAMP synthesis nor inhibited the cAMP synthesis induced by dopamine. The cis isomer also lacked appreciable affinity for [3H]-1a binding sites. N-Methylation of the title compound decreased affinity for D1 sites about 7-8-fold and markedly decreased ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase. Addition of an N-n-propyl group reduced affinity for D1 sites by about 50-fold and essentially abolished the ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase. However, this latter derivative had twice the affinity of the D2-selective agonist quinpirole for the D2 receptor. The results are discussed in the context of a conceptual model for the agonist state of the D1 receptor.
Dihydrexidine (DHX), the first high-affinity D 1 dopamine receptor full agonist, is only 10-fold selective for D 1 versus D 2 receptors, having D 2 affinity similar to the prototypical agonist quinpirole. The D 2 functional properties of DHX and its more D 2 selective analog N-n-propyl-dihydrexidine (PrDHX) were explored in rat brain and pituitary. DHX and PrDHX had binding characteristics to D 2 receptors in rat striatum typical of D 2 agonists, binding to both high-and low-affinity sites and being sensitive to guanine-nucleotides. Consistent with these binding data, both DHX and PrDHX inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP synthesis in striatum with a potency and intrinsic activity equivalent to that of quinpirole. Unexpectedly, however, DHX and PrDHX had little functional effect at D 2 receptors expressed on dopaminergic neurons that mediate inhibition of cell firing, dopamine release, or dopamine synthesis. Quantitative receptor competition autoradiography demonstrated that DHX bound to D 2 receptors in striatum (predominantly postsynaptic receptor sites) with equal affinity as D 2 sites in the substantia nigra (autoreceptor sites). The data from these experiments, coupled with what is known about the location of specific dopamine receptor isoforms, lead to the hypothesis that DHX, after binding to D 2L and D 2S receptors, causes agonist-typical functional changes only at some of these receptors. This phenomenon (herein termed "functional selectivity") suggests that drugs may be targeted not only at specific receptor isoforms but also at separate functions mediated by a single isoform, yielding novel approaches to drug discovery. (D 2S ), D 3 , and D 4 . D 1 -like receptors preferentially recognize 1-phenyl-tetrahydrobenzazepines (e.g., SCH23390) over benzamides (e.g., sulpiride), whereas the D 2 -like receptors have the opposite pharmacological specificity. D 1 -and D 2 -like receptors have been defined traditionally by their opposing effects on the enzyme adenylate cyclase, with D 1 receptors positively coupled to this enzyme, whereas D 2 receptors are either negatively coupled or uncoupled to this effector. More recently, the actions of dopamine D 1 -and D 2 -like receptors on signaling systems other than adenylate cyclase have been confirmed in a variety of systems, including coupling to G protein inwardly rectifying potassium channels, phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, and voltage-activated calcium channels (Jaber et al., 1996).
Compute-aided conformational analysis was used to characterize the agonist pharmacophore for D1 dopamine receptor recognition and activation. Dihydrexidine (DHX), a high-affinity full agonist with limited conformational flexibility, served as a structural template that aided in determining a molecular geometry that would be common for other more flexible, biologically active agonists. The intrinsic activity of the drugs at D1 receptors was assessed by their ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in rat striatal homogenates (the accepted measure of D1 receptor activation). In addition, affinity data on 12 agonists including six purported full agonists (dopamine, dihydrexidine, SKF89626, SKF82958, A70108, and A77636), as well as six less efficacious structural analogs, were obtained from D1 dopamine radioreceptor-binding assays. The active analog approach to pharmacophore building was applied as implemented in the SYBYL software package. Conformational analysis and molecular mechanics calculations were used to determine the lowest energy conformation of the active analogs (i.e., full agonists), as well as the conformations of each compound that displayed a common pharmacophoric geometry. It is hypothesized that DHX and other full agonists may share a D1 pharmacophore made up of two hydroxy groups, the nitrogen atom (ca. 7 A from the oxygen of m-hydroxyl) and the accessory ring system characterized by the angle between its plane and that of the catechol ring (except for dopamine and A77636). For all full agonists (DHX, SKF89626, SKF82958, A70108, A77636, and dopamine), the energy difference between the lowest energy conformer and those that displayed a common pharmacophore geometry was relatively small (< 5 kcal/mol). The pharmacophoric conformations of the full agonists were also used to infer the shape of the receptor binding site. Based on the union of the van der Waals density maps of the active analogs, the excluded receptor volume was calculated. Various inactive analogs (partial agonists with D1 K0.5 > 300 nM) subsequently were used to define the receptor essential volume (i.e., sterically intolerable receptor regions). These volumes, together with the pharmacophore results, were integrated into a three-dimensional model estimating the D1 receptor active site topography.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.