Summary: Reconstruction of lid-cheek junction defects has a known risk of ectropion. Cervicofacial flaps require significant dissection and can still be prone to ectropion. V-Y advancement flaps have been described as less morbid, but their use is limited to moderate-size defects that do not involve the lid margin. The authors present a technique of combined Tripier and V-Y advancement flaps for reconstruction of large defects of the lid-cheek junction involving the lower eyelid. A retrospective review of patients undergoing the authors’ technique was performed. A facial artery perforator flap was designed in a V-Y fashion and advanced into the cheek. An orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap (Tripier flap) was elevated from the upper eyelid and rotated into the lower eyelid/upper cheek to meet the superior edge of the V-Y flap. A separate review of patients undergoing cervicofacial flap reconstruction was also performed. Demographics, operative details, and complications were recorded and compared. This technique was applied to five patients with large-size (19.9 ± 5.6 cm2) defects of the lid-cheek. In all cases, healing was achieved without ectropion, hematoma, infection, dehiscence, flap necrosis, or facial nerve injury. Twenty-four patients separately underwent cervicofacial flap reconstruction for defects of comparable size (15.8 ± 10.7 cm2). Two patients developed ectropion, one patient developed a hematoma, and two patients developed an infection. Combined Tripier and V-Y advancement flaps is a useful technique to reconstruct lid-cheek junction defects. This method allows for the reconstruction of large lid-cheek junction defects that involve the lid margin.

Background: Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes compared to prosthetic techniques, but little is known about the relationship between autologous flap mass and patient satisfaction. We hypothesized that a higher differential mass (ratio of flap mass to mastectomy mass) would be associated with greater satisfaction with reconstruction. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020 with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap completed the BREAST-Q survey. Multivariate linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between differential mass and patient satisfaction. Models controlled for BMI, age at surgery, reconstruction size preference, number of surgeries, previous surgery failure, whether the patient underwent radiation therapy, and whether reconstruction was unilateral or bilateral. Results: 45 patients (70 breasts) completed the BREAST-Q survey. Mean age at reconstruction was 52.2 years old and mean time to survey completion following surgery was 21.1 months. Most patients (59.4%) desired a smaller breast after reconstruction. The mean differential mass was +26.3% (flap mass greater than mastectomy mass). Differential mass was positively associated with all satisfaction measures with results being significant for satisfaction with breasts scores (p = 0.032). Conclusion: In this preliminary study, a higher ratio of autologous flap mass to mastectomy mass was associated with overall higher patient-reported satisfaction. A 1:1 flap to mastectomy mass ratio may not adequately reapproximate desired breast size or shape. Larger autologous flap mass may be favorable for long-term patient satisfaction, and future studies should investigate the relationship between differential mass and breast aesthetics.

Deformational plagiocephaly and brachycephaly, or abnormal flattening of the infant skull due to external forces, are often managed with orthotic helmet therapy. Although helmet therapy is widely used, the factors that predict poor outcomes are not well characterized. In this study of over 140,000 patients who received helmet therapy, older age and greater severity at presentation, and noncompliance with treatment were each independently associated with worse craniometric and provider-reported outcomes. Each additional point of cranial vault asymmetry index or cephalic index at a presentation is associated with an increased likelihood of residual brachycephaly at completion [odds ratio (OR): 1.067; 95% Cl: 1.058–1.075; P<0.0001 and OR: 2.043; 95% CI: 2.021–2.065; P <0.0001, respectively], whereas each additional point of cranial vault asymmetry index at a presentation associated with increased likelihood of residual asymmetry at completion (OR: 2.148; 95% Cl: 2.118–2.179; P<0.0001). Patients were more likely to have residual brachycephaly or asymmetry with increasing age at treatment initiation (OR: 1.562; 95% CI: 1.524–1.600; P<0.0001 and OR: 1.673; 95% Cl: 1.634–1.713; P <0.0001, respectively, for each additional month of age at initiation). These results highlight a need for prompt referral for helmeting, especially in cases with severe features or when patients present late to care. Potentially modifiable factors are age at helmeting and compliance with treatment protocols, and consideration of these factors may be important for achieving success in some cases.

No abstract