In the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial, neither systemic hypothermia nor supplemental protective drug affected short- or long-term neurologic outcomes of patients undergoing temporary clipping.
Background Perioperative hypothermia has been reported to increase the occurrence of cardiovascular complications. By increasing sympathetic nervous system activity, perioperative hypothermia also has the potential to increase cardiac injury and dysfunction associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods The Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial randomized patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery to intraoperative hypothermia (n = 499, 33.3 ± 0.8°C) or normothermia (n = 501, 36.7 ± 0.5°C). Cardiovascular events (hypotension, arrhythmias, vasopressor use, myocardial infarction, etc.) were prospectively followed until 3 month follow-up and were compared between hypothermic and normothermic patients. A subset of 62 patients (hypothermia, n = 33; normothermia, n = 29) also had preoperative and postoperative (within 24 h) measurement of cardiac troponin-I and echocardiography to explore the association between perioperative hypothermia and subarachnoid hemorrhage-associated myocardial injury and left ventricular function. Results There was no difference between hypothermic and normothermic patients in the occurrence of any single cardiovascular event or in composite cardiovascular events. There was no difference in mortality (6%) between groups and there was only a single primary cardiovascular death (normothermia). There was no difference between hypothermic and normothermic patients in post- vs. preoperative left ventricular regional wall motion or ejection fraction. Compared with preoperative values, hypothermic patients had no postoperative increase in cardiac troponin-I (median change 0.00 μg/L) whereas normothermic patients had a small postoperative increase (median change + 0.01 μg/L, P = 0.038). Conclusion In patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery, perioperative hypothermia was not associated with an increased occurrence of cardiovascular events.
Background We explored the relationship between nitrous oxide use and neurological and neuropsychological outcome in a population of patients likely to experience intraoperative cerebral ischemia: i.e., those who had temporary cerebral arterial occlusion during aneurysm clipping surgery. Methods A post hoc analysis of a subset of the data from the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial was conducted. Only subjects who had temporary arterial occlusion during surgery were included in the analysis. Metrics of short-term and long-term (i.e., 3 months post-surgery) outcome were evaluated via both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. An odds ratio (OR) of greater than 1.0 denotes a worse outcome in patients receiving nitrous oxide. Results We evaluated 441 patients, of which 199 received nitrous oxide. Patients receiving nitrous oxide had a greater risk of delayed ischemic neurologic deficits (i.e., the clinical manifestation of vasospasm) (OR=1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08–2.95, p=0.025). However, at 3 months after surgery, there was no difference in any metric of gross neurologic outcome: Glasgow Outcome Score (OR=0.67, CI=0.44–1.03, p=0.065), Rankin Score (OR=0.74, CI=0.47–1.16, p=0.192), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (OR=1.02, CI=0.66–1.56, p=0.937), or Barthel’s Index (OR=0.69, CI=0.38–1.25, p=0.22). The risk of impairment on at least one test of neuropsychological function was reduced in those who received nitrous oxide (OR=0.56, CI=0.36–0.89, p=0.013). Conclusion In our patient population, use of nitrous oxide was associated with an increased risk for the development of delayed ischemic neurologic deficits; however, there was no evidence of detriment to long-term gross neurologic or neuropsychological outcome.
The aim of this study was to compare two conscious sedation techniques, midazolam (M) and propofol (P), for interventional neuroradiology by assessment of the incidence of complications and satisfaction scores. Methods" Forty patients were randomized to receive 0.75 pg-kg -~ fentanyl and a M or P bolus followed by an infusion; (M 15/Jg.k~ t + 0.5 Aug'kg-~'min-'; P 0.5 mg'kE-' + 25/Ig'kg -I rain-'), The incidences of complications and untoward events requiring intervention were documented. These included respiratory depression, excessive pain, inappropriate movements and the inability to examine the patient. TI~ satisfaction of the anaesthetic technique from the perspective of both the neuroradiolc~st and the patient was scored. ][~b~ull~: The incidence and types of complications were not different between the two groups. Pain occurred in 12 patients (6M, 6P), inappropriate movements in 17 (7M, lOP) and respiratory changes in I0 patients (2M, 8P). Conclusions, Both techniques were satisfa~.'-tory and the incidence of complications was similar for both groups.Objectis Cette (~tude visait t~ comparer deux m&hodes de s~dation consciente, le midazolam (M) et le propofol (P) pour les interventions neuroradiologiques en ~valuant l'incidence des complications et le de~m~ de satisfaction. M~l:hod~ : Quarante patients ont 6t~ r~partis al~atoirement pour recevoir fentanyI 0,75/Jg'kg-' et un bolus de P ou de M suivi par une perfusion : (M 15 ilJg-kg -I + 0,5 ~g'kg -Imin-I; P 0,5 mg'k~ ~ + 25 pg'kg -I min-I). L'incidence des complications et des effets ind&irables r~cessitant une intervention a ~t~ enregi~, La d~pres-sion respiratoire, la douleur exa~r~ae, les mouvements inappropri& et I'incapacit~ de subir rexamen ~taient consid&vas comme ind~irables. Un score &luivalent au degr~ de satisfaction i~ I'C~ard de la technique anesth~ique ~tait attribu~ en tenant compte du point de rue de I'anesth&iste et de celui du radiologiste, P,~sultal~ 9 I'incidence et le type de complication ne diff&aient pas entre les deux groupes. La douleur a ~t~ rapportc~e par 12 patients (61'4, 6P), des mouvements inappropri~ chez 17 patients (7M, I 0P) et des aJt&ations de la respiration chez 10 patients (2M, 8P). C, oncl~ion : Les deux techniques ont ~t~ satisfaisantes et I'incidence des complications ~atait la m~me darts les deux groupes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.