PVT or PVS and HVOO are known causes of graft and patient loss after pediatric liver transplantation. Increased incidences of these complications have been reported in partial livers including DDSLT or LDLT. From 1997 to 2008, 241 consecutive pediatric patients received 271 hepatic grafts at a single center. Median follow-up is 1856 days. Surgical technique, demographics, lab values, and radiologic imaging procedures were obtained utilizing OTTR to evaluate the relationship of portal and hepatic complications with risk factors, patient and graft survival. Grafts were composed of 115/271 (42.4%) partial livers of which 90 (33.2%) were DDSLT and 25 (9.2%) LDLT. Of 271 patients, 156 (57.6%) received whole-sized grafts. There were six PVC in five patients with one patient requiring retransplantation (0.34%) and no patient deaths. Utilizing all three hepatic vein orifices on the recipient hepatic vena cava and the donor hepatic vein cut short enables a wide hepatic outflow tract unlikely to twist. None of the 241 patients developed early or late complications of the hepatic vein. None of the last 128 consecutive patients who received 144 grafts over seven and a half yr have developed either early or late complications of the hepatic or portal vein. Partial-graft actuarial survival was similar to whole-graft survival (87.2% vs. 85.3% at one yr; 76.6% vs. 80.2 at three yr; p = 0.488). Likewise, patient survival was similar between partial grafts and whole grafts (93.8% vs. 93.1% at one yr; 89.8% vs. 87.2% at three yr; p = 0.688) with median follow-up of 1822 (+/-1334) days. Patients receiving partial livers were significantly younger and smaller than patients receiving whole livers (p < 0.001). Portal and hepatic venous complications may have negative effects on patient or graft survival after pediatric liver transplantation. In our series, there was one graft and no patient loss related to portal or hepatic venous complications after pediatric liver transplantation over 12 yr.
Cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the most common food allergy in infancy. Non-IgE mediated (NIM) forms are little studied and the responsible mechanisms of tolerance acquisition remain obscure. Our aim was to study the intestinal microbiota and related parameters in the fecal samples of infants with NIM-CMPA, to establish potential links between type of formula substitutes, microbiota, and desensitization. Seventeen infants between one and two years old, diagnosed with NIM-CMPA, were recruited. They were all on an exclusion diet for six months, consuming different therapeutic protein hydrolysates. After this period, stool samples were obtained and tolerance development was evaluated by oral challenges. A control group of 10 age-matched healthy infants on an unrestricted diet were included in the study. Microbiota composition, short-chain fatty acids, calprotectin, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 levels were determined in fecal samples from both groups. Infants with NIM-CMPA that consumed vegetable protein-based formulas presented microbiota colonization patterns different from those fed with an extensively hydrolyzed formula. Differences in microbiota composition and fecal parameters between NIM-CMPA and healthy infants were observed. Non-allergic infants showed a significantly higher proportion of Bacteroides compared to infants with NIM-CMPA. The type of protein hydrolysate was found to determine gut microbiota colonization and influence food allergy resolution in NIM-CMPA cases.
Background: It has recently been suggested that serum procalcitonin (PCT) is of value in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, with varying results. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the usefulness of PCT as a marker of neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.