The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibility studies or technical descriptions; few cohort analyses exist. This systematic review aims to characterize trends in robotic autologous breast reconstruction and provide a summative analysis of their results. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate robot use in breast reconstruction. Studies dated from 2006 to 2022 were identified and analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text, peer-reviewed, English-language, and human subject studies were included. Non-breast reconstruction articles, commentary, expert opinion, editor’s letter, and duplicate studies were excluded. A total of 17 full-text articles were analyzed. The two robotic breast procedures identified were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Results showed comparable complication rates and increased operative times compared to NSQIP data on their corresponding open techniques. Additional findings reported in studies included patient reported outcomes, incision lengths, and downward trends in operative time with consecutive procedures. The available data in the literature confirms that robotic surgery is a promising alternative to traditional open methods of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
A rare occurrence of an atypical case of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) in a 75-year-old man without viral prodrome or white dots on fundus that presented with acute, severe left eye visual loss, which returned to baseline without treatment in several weeks. Multimodal imaging, including fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), indocyanine green angiography (ICG), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated classical presentation of MEWDS with wreath-like lesions and inflammatory foci in the retinal pigment epithelium that correlated among modalities. Possible underlying systemic disorders were ruled out through extended work up. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to show atypical MEWDS in an elderly man with classic changes on FA, FAF, ICG, and OCT.
Purpose: To compare the choroidal thickness before and after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.Methods: A retrospective case series of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment patients presenting between January 2015 and September 2020. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and anatomical success were measured in operated eyes and fellow eyes at presentation, as well as 3 months and 6 months after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.Results: A total of 93 patients (males 59%) with a mean age of 61.8 ± 15.2 years were included. Eighty-one patients were anatomically successful (Group 1) and 12 redetached (Group 2). The mean SFCT of the operated eye at presentation was 258.3 ± 82.0 mm in comparison with 257.5 ± 83.7 mm in the fellow eye (P = 0.96). Group 2 presented with thicker SFCT than Group 1 at baseline (309.2 ± 56.2 vs. 250.7 ± 82.8 mm; P = 0.01). Both groups demonstrated thinning trend throughout follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, the mean SFCT was 225.6 ± 75.5 mm (P = 0.05). Fellow-eye SFCT was stable throughout follow-up (257 ± 83.7 at baseline vs. 255 ± 80.2 mm at 6 months).Conclusion: Eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment demonstrated thinning in the SFCT after vitrectomy surgery. Eyes with recurrent retinal detachment presented with a thicker choroid at baseline. Thicker SFCT at presentation may play a role in retinal redetachment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.