149 previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited over a three year period and randomly allocated to either low dose levodopa-carbidopa
One hundred de novo patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were classified into two groups according to age of onset of symptoms. Seventy two patients were under 70 years and 28 were 70 years and over. All patients were given neurological and neuropsychological assessments, and the severity of the signs was rated on a modified Columbia scale. The neuropsychological assessment was also administered to 50 age-and-education-matched controls. The neuropsychological test battery included tests of verbal learning, visual memory, verbal fluency, visuospatial skill, simple and choice reaction time, language and maze learning. The late-onset patients had significant impairment in nonverbal reasoning, auditory verbal learning, visual memory and choice reaction time in contrast to early-onset patients and controls. A relationship was found between bradykinesia and widespread cognitive impairment. Severity of tremor was found to be significantly correlated with impairment in auditory verbal learning, visual memory and increased choice reaction time, while rigidity was found to be associated with cognitive impairment in verbal fluency and visuospatial skill. Using DSM II criteria, 39% of the late-onset and 8% of the early-onset group were classified as demented. Dementia was more common in patients with bilateral symmetrical disease and in those patients with marked tremor and bradykinesia. The pattern of cognitive impairment in PD was consistent with that associated with a subcortical dementia. This study confirms that the expression of PD is markedly influenced by the age of onset.
SUMMARY One hundred and twenty nine de novo patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease are being followed over a 5 year period in a double-blind multicentre study comparing low-dose bromocriptine (< 30 mg/day) with low-dose levodopa-carbidopa (< 600/150 mg/day). Sixty six patients have been randomised to bromocriptine and 63 patients to levodopa-carbidopa. Improvement has been greater in the levodopa-carbidopa group than in the bromocriptine group. Involuntary movements have so far only occurred in patients on levodopa-carbidopa, the incidence being much lower than is usually described with conventional doses. Mild, end-of-dose failure has occurred in both treatment groups; however, no patient has developed the "on-off' phenomenon. Low-dose levodopa-carbidopa appears to be a more effective anti-Parkinsonian treatment than lowdose bromocriptine but more prone to cause dyskinesia.The value of levodopa in the long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease is limited by the emergence of dyskinesia and the "on-of' phenomenon.'-3 Attempts to reduce the incidence of these problems by giving levodopa in low dosage have met with limited success.45 Dyskinesia has rarely been observed and the "on-off" phenomenon has not been described in patients treated with bromocriptine alone.'5 Nausea, postural hypotension and confusion limit the use of bromocriptine in up to 35% of patients using conventional doses.>" Several studies have shown that these side-effects can be minimised by giving bromocriptine in low dosage.'1213The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side-effects of low dose bromocriptine (< 30 mg/day) with low-dose levodopa-carbidopa (< 600/150 mg/ day) over a 5 year period in de novo patients. We report the results ofthe first 3 years of the study during which patients were recruited.
MethodsOne hundred and forty nine patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were recruited over a 3 year period from neurologists and general practitioners in the Sydney area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.