Background:
Loss of meniscal tissue in the pediatric population can have long-term consequences on joint health, highlighting the importance of meniscal preservation in this group.
Purpose:
To systematically review reported knee outcome measures and complication rates after repair of meniscal tears in children and adolescents.
Study Design:
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
A review of the literature regarding the existing evidence for pediatric meniscal tear outcomes was performed through use of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-present), and MEDLINE (1980-present). Included were articles in English that reported the outcomes of meniscal tears in the pediatric population (<18 years old) with a follow-up of more than 12 months. Clinical outcome scores were reviewed.
Results:
A total of 1003 total studies were initially retrieved, with 8 meeting the inclusion criteria. The review included 287 patients (165 male, 122 female), mean age 15.1 years (range, 4-18 years), with 301 meniscal tears (reported: 134 medial, 127 lateral, and 32 both medial and lateral, 8 location unspecified). Concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed in 52% (158/301) of meniscal repairs. The average reported postoperative Lysholm scores ranged from 85.4 to 96.3, and the average reported postoperative Tegner activity scores ranged from 6.2 to 8.
Conclusion:
Arthroscopic repair of a meniscal tear in the pediatric and adolescent population is an effective treatment option that has a low failure rate, enhances postoperative clinical outcomes, and preserves meniscal tissues.
Background:
The effects of perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on
soft tissue healing in humans have yet to be established.
Purpose:
To systematically review the literature addressing the effects of
perioperative NSAID administration on soft tissue healing and clinical
patient outcomes.
Study Design:
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
This review study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. A
review of the literature regarding the existing evidence for clinical
effects of NSAID use on soft tissue healing was performed through use of the
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980 to present), and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria
for articles were as follows: outcome studies after soft tissue (ligament,
meniscus, tendon, muscle) healing after surgical procedure with
perioperative NSAID administration, at least 1 year of follow-up, English
language, and human participants.
Results:
A total of 466 studies were initially retrieved, with 4 studies satisfying
all inclusion criteria. Among the surgical procedures reported, 93% of the
patients (4144/4451) underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
reconstruction, 3% (120/4451) underwent rotator cuff repair, 3% (155/4451)
underwent Bankart shoulder repair, and 1% (32/4451) underwent meniscal
repair. The reported surgical failure rate among patients administered
NSAIDs was 3.6% (157/4360). The reported surgical failure rate among control
participants not given NSAIDs was 3.7% (147/3996). NSAID use showed no
statistically significant effect on need for reoperation in meniscal repair
(
P
= .99), ACL reconstruction (
P
=
.8), and Bankart repair (
P
= .8) compared with no NSAID
administration. Celecoxib administration had a significantly higher rate of
retear (37%) after rotator cuff repair compared with ibuprofen (7%)
(
P
= .009).
Conclusion:
Insufficient data are available to definitively state the effects of
perioperative NSAIDs on soft tissue healing. Use of NSAIDs should be
considered on a case-by-case basis and may not affect healing rates
following either meniscal, ACL, rotator cuff, or Bankart repair. However,
celecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) may inhibit tendon-to-bone healing
in rotator cuff repair. Further research through clinical trials is required
to fully determine whether NSAIDs have an adverse effect on soft tissue
healing.
Purpose
Commercially available smartphone apps and wearable devices have proven valuable in a variety of clinical settings, yet their utility in measuring physical activity and monitoring patient status following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear.
Methods
A systematic review was performed to assess the evidence supporting the use of smartphone apps and wearable devices to assist rehabilitation interventions following TKA. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and Web of Science databases in September 2021.
Results
One hundred and seventy-six studies were retrieved, of which 15 met inclusion criteria, including 6 randomized control trials. Four of these studies utilized smartphone apps, seven utilized wearable devices, and four utilized a combination of both. A total of 1607 TKA patients participated in the included studies. For primary outcomes, three reported on device accuracy, three on recovery prediction, two on functional recovery, two on physical activity promotion, two on patient compliance, two on pain control, and one on healthcare utilization.
Conclusion
Commercially available smartphone apps and wearable devices were shown to capably monitor physical activity and improve patient engagement following TKA, making them potentially viable adjuncts or replacements to traditional rehabilitation programs. Components of interventions such as step goals, app-based patient engagement platforms, and patient-specific benchmarks for recovery may improve effectiveness. However, future research should focus on the economics of implementation, long-term outcomes, and optimization of compliance and accuracy when using these devices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.