Repetitive elicitation of startle-like responses by electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus led to sensitization followed by habituation. In contrast, repetitive elicitation of startle-like responses by electrical stimulation of the reticular formation led only to sensitization. Since these different locations represent different points along the acoustic startle circuit, the data suggest that sensitization may be related to the motor side of reflex arcs, whereas habituation may be related to the sensory side.

Rats were presented with startle-eliciting tones after injection of clonidine (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg) or saline. Clonidine potently depressed startle amplitude and the effect was monotonically related todose. Pretreatment with piperoxane (10 mg/kg) antagonized this effect but pretreatment with phentolamine (10 mg/kg) did not. Clonidine still depressed startle in acutely decerebrate rats and in rats with bilateral ablation of the locus coeruleus. Clonidine did not interfere with sensitization to background noise and did not interfere with the ability to startle but instead improved within-session habituation. The results represent one of the few instances in the literature where a drug appears to improve habituation without directly interfering with the ability to respond. The possibility that clonidine might affect startle by stimulating central epinephrine rather than norepinephrine receptors is discussed.

The effects of different doses (0.03, 0.06, 0.12, 0.25, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mg/kg body weight) of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT) were tested on the acoustic startle reflex in rats. Beginning at 0.12 mg/kg, 5-MeODMT increased startle monotonically up to the highest dose used. 5-MeODMT still increased startle in acutely decerebrate rats or when infused directly onto the spinal cord. The excitatory effects of a high systemic dose of 5-MeODMT were completely blocked by cinanserin, cyproheptadine, and propranolol, but not by parachlorophenylalanine, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, haloperidol, sotalol, or phenoxybenzamine. The results were discussed in terms of a new theory, which suggests that stimulation of serotonin receptors in the spinal cord enhance startle whereas serotonin receptors in the forebrain inhibit startle.