No abstract

To determine the relative efficacy of storeand-forward teledermatology vs face-to-face dermatology consultations in triage decisions about the need for a biopsy of neoplastic skin changes.Design: Prospective study of consecutive patients judged by an internist to require dermatologic consultation for a skin growth.Setting: Private primary care and dermatology practices and an academic dermatology practice.Patients: Patients requiring dermatology consultation for evaluation of skin growths. Patients were seen by a single primary care physician between July 10, 1998, and August 4, 2000.Intervention: Digital photographs of skin growths were obtained by the primary care physician and evaluated by a teledermatologist. The patient was then seen face-to-face by a dermatologist. A biopsy was performed if either dermatologist favored biopsy.Main Outcome Measures: Decisions to perform a biopsy. Agreement between the dermatologists was assessed.Results: Of the 49 patients with evaluable photographs, the face-to-face dermatologist and teledermatologist recommended a biopsy for the same 26 patients, yielding a sensitivity of the teledermatologist of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.00) and a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85-1.00). The agreement between the dermatologists () was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.72-1.00). Conclusion:Store-and-forward teledermatology may provide an accurate and cost-effective method of determining whether skin growths in patients presenting to primary care physicians should undergo biopsy.

No abstract