Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the prostate represent a multifarious group of tumors that exist both in pure forms and associated with prostatic adenocarcinoma. Morphologically, neuroendocrine cells in prostate neoplasms can range from being indistinguishable from surrounding prostate adenocarcinoma cells to having high-grade neuroendocrine appearances similar to neuroendocrine malignancies of other organs. On the molecular level, neuroendocrine malignancies arising in the setting of prostate adenocarcinoma have been the subject of a large amount of recent research, most of which has supported the conclusion that neuroendocrine malignancy within the prostate develops as a transdifferentiation from prostate adenocarcinoma. There has not, however, been substantial investigation into rare, pure neuroendocrine malignancies and the possibility that these tumors may have a different cell of origin and molecular genesis. Here, we discuss the morphologic spectrum of malignant neuroendocrine prostate neoplasms and review the most recent molecular data on the subject of malignant neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic adenocarcinoma. In reflection of the most recent data, we also discuss diagnostic classification of prostate neuroendocrine tumors with reference to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We discuss the reporting of these tumors, placing emphasis on the differentiation between pure and mixed neuroendocrine malignancies so that, in the least, they can be easily identified for the purposes of future clinical and laboratory-based investigation. Finally, we suggest a designation for an unclassifiable (or not otherwise specified) high-grade neuroendocrine prostate malignancy whose features do not easily place it into one of the WHO diagnostic entities.

Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) of the brain are considered congenital. Most AVMs are presumably sporadic, however rare familial cases occur and they may be observed in certain genetic disorders. We sought to determine the frequency of KRAS mutations and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics. We searched our neuropathology database from 2014-2017 for resected AVMs of the brain or dura mater. Twenty-one AVMs were tested (12 females, 9 males; average age: 32 years). KRAS mutations were found in 6/21 cases (28.5%). Five mutations were p.G12V, and one p.G12C. The KRAS-mutant group contained 4 females and 2 males, with an average age of 28 years, compared to 34 years in the non-mutant group (p=0.54). The average AVM size in the KRAS-mutant group was 3.9 cm, compared to 3.1 cm in the nonmutant group (p=0.52). There were no histologic differences between KRAS-mutant and nonmutant cases. In summary, KRAS mutations occur in almost one third of brain AVMs. KRAS p.G12V was the most common mutation identified. We also demonstrate the first reported instance of a KRAS p.G12C mutation in a brain AVM. The mean age of patients with KRASmutant AVMs was lower than the non-mutant group, and the mean size larger. Histologic characteristics were equally distributed between KRAS-mutant and non-mutant groups.

Context: This study represents the largest compilation to date of clinical and postmortem data from decedents with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It will augment previously published small series of autopsy case reports, refine clinicopathologic considerations, and improve the accuracy of future vital statistical reporting. Objective: To accurately reflect the pre-existing diseases and pathologic conditions of decedents with Sars-CoV-2 infection through autopsy. Design: Comprehensive data from 135 autopsy evaluations of COVID-19-positive decedents is presented, including histologic assessment. Postmortem examinations were performed by 36 pathologists at 19 medical centers or forensic institutions in the United States and Brazil. Data from each autopsy were collected through the online submission of multiple choice and openended survey responses. Results: Patients dying of or with COVID-19 had an average of 8.89 pathologic conditions documented at autopsy, spanning a combination of prior chronic disease and acute conditions acquired during hospitalization. Virtually all decedents were cited as having more than one preexisting condition, encompassing an average of 2.88 such diseases each. Clinical conditions during terminal hospitalization were cited 395 times for the 135 autopsied decedents and predominantly encompassed acute failure of multiple organ systems and/or impaired coagulation. Myocarditis was rarely cited. Conclusions: Cause-of-death statements in both autopsy reports and death certificates may not encompass the severity or spectrum of co-morbid conditions in those dying of or with COVID-19. If supported by additional research, this finding may have implications for public health decisions and reporting moving forward through the pandemic.

No abstract