Background Pain is one of the major symptoms complained about by patients in the prehospital setting, especially in the case of trauma. When there is mountainous topography, as in Switzerland, there may be a time delay between injury and arrival of professional rescuers, in particular on ski slopes. Administration of a safe opioid by first responders may improve overall treatment. We therefore assessed administration of nasal nalbuphine as an analgesic treatment for trauma patients in Switzerland. Methods This observational cohort study examined 267 patients who were treated with nasal nalbuphine by first responders in six ski resorts in Switzerland. All first responders were instructed to begin treatment by assessing the feasibility of using nalbuphine to treat pain in the patient. A treatment algorithm was developed and distributed to assure that nalbuphine was only administered following a strict protocol. Data regarding pain scores and pain reduction after administration of nalbuphine were collected on-site. Refills were handed out to the first responders with the return of each completed questionnaire. Results Nalbuphine provided effective pain relief, with the median level of pain on the numeric rating scale for pain reduced by 3 units on average, from 8 points (p < 0.001). The multivariate regression model showed that pain reduction was more pronounced in patients with higher initial pain levels. Nalbuphine was more effective in adolsecents than in patients aged 20 to 60 years (p = 0.006). No major side effects were observed. Conclusion Nasal administration of nalbuphine by first responders is a presumably safe and effective noninvasive pain management strategy for acutely injured patients in the prehospital setting. This may be an alternative, especially in the case of severe pain and prolonged time between arrival of the first responders and arrival of EMS/HEMS personnel on scene.

We found low rates of poison centre consultation by emergency physicians. It appears that intensive care unit admission and other factors reflecting either complexity or uncertainty of the clinical situation are the strongest predictors for poison centre consultation. Hospital size did not influence referral behaviour.

Die Akutbehandlung des Hirnschlags hat enorme Fortschritte gemacht. Um die Therapie ohne Zeitverlust durchführen zu können, muss die Organisation der Vorspitalphase angepasst werden. Entsprechend hat die Schweizerische Hirnschlag Gesellschaft mit ihren Partnergesellschaften diese Guideline erarbeitet. Die Artikel in der Rubrik «Richtlinien» geben nicht unbedingt die Ansicht der SMF-Redaktion wieder. Die Inhalte unterstehen der redaktionellen Verantwortung der unterzeichnenden Fachgesellschaft bzw. Arbeitsgruppe. Die hier vorliegende Leitlinie wurde von der Schweizerischen Hirnschlag Gesellschaft, der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Notfall-und Rettungsmedizin, der Schweizerischen Neurologischen Gesellschaft, der Vereinigung Rettungssanitäter Schweiz und vom Interverband für Rettungswesen miterarbeitet und gutgeheissen.

Background Pain is one of the major symptoms complained about by patients in the prehospital setting, especially in trauma. Due to the mountainous topography, there may be a time delay between injury and arrival of professional rescuers, in particular on ski slopes. Administration of a safe opioid by first responders (FR) may improve overall treatment. We therefore assessed the use of nasally administered Nalbuphine as analgesic treatment in trauma patients by FR at various skis resort in Switzerland.Methods This observational study examined a cohort of 267 patients given Nalbuphine by FR in various ski resorts in Switzerland. All FR were instructed how to administer Nalbuphine before treating patients. A treatment algorithm was developed and distributed to assure that Nalbuphine was only administered following a strict protocol. Data regarding pain scores and pain reduction after administration of Nalbuphine were collected on-site. Refills were handed out with each completed questionnaire.Results Nalbuphine decreased the level of pain statistically significant and clinically relevant by a median of 3 units on the NRS for pain. The multivariate regression model showed that pain reduction was more pronounced in patients with higher initial pain level. Nalbuphine was less effective in patients aged 20-60 years compared to the adolescent population. No major side effects were observed.Conclusion Nasal Nalbuphine by FR was a noninvasive pain management strategy that provided safe and effective analgesia in prehospital, acute­ly injured patients. This may be an alternative method especially in circumstances of severe pain and prolonged time between arrival of the FR and arrival of EMS / HEMS personnel on scene.