1. Anatomical and single-unit recording studies suggest that the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) in monkey is a major link in the projection of descending visual motion information to the cerebellum. Such studies coupled with cortical and cerebellar lesion results suggest a major role for this basilar pontine region in the mediation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. 2. To provide more direct evidence that this pontine region is involved in the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements, focal chemical lesions were made in DLPN in the vicinity of previously recorded visual motion and pursuit-related neurons. Eye movement responses were subsequently recorded in these lesioned animals under several behavioral paradigms. 3. A major deficit in smooth-pursuit performance was produced after unilateral DLPN lesions generated either reversibly with lidocaine or more permanently with ibotenic acid. Pursuit impairments were observed during steady-state tracking of sinusoidal target motion as well as during the initiation of pursuit tracking to sudden ramp target motion. Through the use of the latter technique, initial eye acceleration was reduced to less than one-half of normal for animals with large lesions of the dorsolateral and lateral pontine nuclei. 4. The pursuit deficit in all animals was directional in nature and was not dependent on the visual hemifield in which the motion stimulus occurred. The largest effect for horizontal tracking occurred in all animals for pursuit directed ipsilateral to the lesion. Animals also showed major deficits in one or both directions of vertical pursuit, although the primary direction of the vertical impairment was variable from animal to animal. 5. Chemical lesions in the DLPN also produced comparable deficits in the initiation of optokinetic-induced smooth eye movements in the ipsilateral direction. In contrast to this effect on the initial optokinetic response, in the one lesioned animal studied during prolonged constant velocity optokinetic drum rotation, smooth eye speed increased slowly over a 10- to 15-s period to reach a level that closely matched drum speed. These results suggest that pathways outside the DLPN can generate the steady-state optokinetic response. 6. Saccades to stationary targets were normal after DLPN lesions, but corrective saccades made to targets moving in the direction ipsilateral to the lesion were much more hypometric than similar prelesion control saccades. 7. The pursuit deficits produced by lidocaine injections recovered within 30 min. The ibotenic acid deficits were maximal approximately 1 day after the injection and recovered rapidly thereafter over a time period of 3-7 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. In this study we sought to characterize the visual motion processing that exists in the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) and make a comparison with the reported visual responses of the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas of the monkey cerebral cortex. The DLPN is implicated as a component of the visuomotor interface involved with the regulation of smooth-pursuit eye movements, because it is a major terminus for afferents from MT and MST and also the source of efferents to cerebellar regions involved with eye-movement control. 2. Some DLPN cells were preferentially responsive to discrete (spot and bar) visual stimuli, or to large-field, random-dot pattern motion, or to both discrete and large-field visual motion. The results suggest differential input from localized regions of MT and MST. 3. The visual-motion responses of DLPN neurons were direction selective for 86% of the discrete visual responses and 95% of the large-field responses. Direction tuning bandwidths (full-width at 50% maximum response amplitude) averaged 107 degrees and 120 degrees for discrete and large-field visual motion responses, respectively. For the two visual response types, the direction index averaged 0.95 and 1.02, indicating that responses to stimuli moving in preferred directions were, on average, 20 and 50 times greater than responses to discrete or large-field stimulus movement in the opposite directions, respectively. 4. Most of the DLPN visual responses to movements of discrete visual stimuli exhibited increases in amplitude up to preferred retinal image speeds between 20 and 80 degrees/s, with an average preferred speed of 39 degrees/s. At higher speeds, the response amplitude of most units decreased, although a few units exhibited a broad saturation in response amplitude that was maintained up to at least 150 degrees/s before the response decreased. Over the range of speeds up to the preferred speeds, the sensitivity of DLPN neurons to discrete stimulus-related, retinal-image speed averaged 3.0 spikes/s per deg/s. The responses to large-field visual motion were less sensitive to retinal image speed and exhibited an average sensitivity of 1.4 spikes/s per deg/s before the visual response saturated. 5. DLPN and MT were quantitatively comparable with respect to degree of direction selectivity, retinal image speed tuning, and distribution of preferred speeds. Many DLPN receptive fields contained the fovea and were larger than those of MT and more like MST receptive fields in size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

No abstract

1. Purkinje cell activity was recorded from lobules VI and VII of the cerebellar vermis during the performance of visuooculomotor tasks designed to dissociate the signals related to head, smooth-pursuit eye, and retinal image movements. Task-related modulations in the simple spike discharge rates of 157 cells were observed in three alert monkeys. 2. Of 65 Purkinje cells that were completely tested for all three signals, all exhibited smooth-pursuit eye movement-related activity. An additional vestibular or visual response was observed in 17 and 11% of the cells, respectively. Eye, head, and retinal image velocity signals were all recorded in the same unit in 52% of the Purkinje cells. The responses of 5% of the fully tested cells were associated with changes in the direction of eye, head, and retinal image movement. 3. The observed sensorioculomotor responses were direction selective in 98% of the Purkinje cells. For the Purkinje cells that were fully tested, 60% of the cells exhibited peak discharge rates for ipsilateral and 40% for contralateral eye velocity. Of these Purkinje cells, 45% exhibited eye, head, and retinal image velocity signals with equivalent direction preferences. 4. Of 42 Purkinje cells tested, 88% demonstrated some kinds of interactive responses during combined eye and sensory stimulation. The interaction of eye and head velocity signals has been discussed in a companion paper (38). The modulation in discharge rate observed during tracking in the presence of a random dot background pattern could be predicted from the dissociated responses to smooth pursuit in the dark and to movements of the background pattern during suppression of eye movements. 5. The sensitivity to smooth-pursuit eye velocity averaged 1.4 times the sensitivity to head velocity. In 80% of the Purkinje cells, however, the sensitivity to eye velocity exceeded the sensitivity to head velocity by an average of only 10%. The sensitivity to smooth-pursuit eye velocity averaged 1.6 times the sensitivity to retinal image velocity. 6. An increase in Purkinje cell discharge rate was observed during the open-loop period of the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. This open-loop response was consistent with the presence of a visual signal during ocular pursuit, since these cells were also shown to be responsive to a dissociated retinal image velocity signal. Furthermore, the magnitude of the open-loop response indicated an enhancement of the sensitivity to retinal image velocity when visual information became behaviorally significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

No abstract