Background Even though 8%‐25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de‐labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. Methods We performed an evidence‐based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de‐labeling. Over the period 1928‐2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included “penicillin allergy” or “penicillin hypersensitivity” alone or in combination with “adverse events,” “testing,” “evaluation,” “effects,” “label,” “de‐labeling,” “prick or epicutaneous,” and “intradermal” skin testing, “oral challenge or provocation,” “cross‐reactivity,” and “antimicrobial stewardship”. Results Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance. Conclusions Operationalizing penicillin allergy de‐labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de‐labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.

Purpose Activation of the c-Met and epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) promotes growth and survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Specific receptor antagonists have demonstrated efficacy in the clinic; however, tumors often become resistant to these therapies. We have investigated the ability of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) to inhibit cell proliferation, and c-Met receptor and EGFR kinase activation in several NSCLC cell lines. Experimental Design NSCLC cell lines with variable sensitivity to the EGFR antagonist erlotinib were studied. Cell growth was evaluated using MTS and colony formation assays. Kinase activation was assessed via western blot analysis. Experiments were conducted with EGCG, the EGFR antagonist erlotinib and the c-Met inhibitor SU11274. The antagonists were also tested in a xenograft model using SCID mice. Results EGCG inhibited cell proliferation in erlotinib sensitive and resistant cell lines, including those with c-Met overexpression and acquired resistance to erlotinib. The combination of erlotinib/EGCG resulted in greater inhibition of cell proliferation and colony formation than either agent alone. EGCG also completely inhibited ligand-induced c-Met phosphorylation and partially inhibited EGFR phosphorylation. The triple combination of EGCG/erlotinib/SU11274 resulted in a greater inhibition of proliferation than EGCG with erlotinib. Finally, the combination of EGCG and erlotinib significantly slowed the growth rate of H460 xenografts. Conclusion EGCG is a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation, independent of EGFR inhibition, in several NSCLC cell lines, including those resistant to both EGFR kinase inhibitors and those overexpressing c-Met. Therefore, EGCG might be a useful agent to study as an adjunct to other anti-cancer agents.

Invasion and subsequent metastasis is the major cause of death from most cancers including prostate cancer. Herein we report on the potential tumor suppressive properties of Rab7, a GTPase that regulates trafficking of lysosomes. The movement of lysosomes to the cell surface in response to environmental cues increases the secretion of proteinases and cell invasion. We determined that Troglitazone and other members of the Thiazolidinedione family inhibit cell-surface directed lysosome trafficking and cathepsin B secretion through a Rab7-dependent mechanism. Moreover, Rab7 shRNA expressing cells were found to be more invasive in vitro and in vivo. Increased invasiveness was accompanied by elevated expression of the c-Met receptor and prolonged downstream signaling, thereby supporting a role for Rab7 as a mediator of signaling down-regulation. Taken together, these results suggested that Rab7 acts as a negative regulator of prostate tumor growth and invasion, providing further evidence for its potential as a tumor suppressor.

Our data demonstrate that macrophage-associated lipin-1 is atherogenic, likely through persistent activation of a protein kinase Cα/βII-extracellular receptor kinase1/2-jun proto-oncogene signaling cascade that contributes to foam cell proinflammatory responses. Taken together, these results suggest that modLDL-induced foam cell formation and modLDL-induced macrophage proinflammatory responses are not independent consequences of modLDL stimulation but rather are both directly influenced by enhanced lipid synthesis.