OBJECTIVES To evaluate the utility of rapid, quantitative T2 mapping compared with conventional T2-weighted imaging in patients presenting with various forms of acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) identifies myocardial edema before the onset of irreversible ischemic injury and has shown value in risk-stratifying patients with chest pain. Clinical acceptance of T2-weighted CMR has, however, been limited by well-known technical problems associated with existing techniques. T2 quantification has recently been shown to overcome these problems; we hypothesized that T2 measurement in infarcted myocardium versus remote regions versus zones of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction patients could help reduce uncertainty in interpretation of T2-weighted images. METHODS T2 values using a novel mapping technique were prospectively recorded in 16 myocardial segments in 27 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. Regional T2 values were averaged in the infarct zone and remote myocardium, both defined by a reviewer blinded to the results of T2 mapping. Myocardial T2 was also measured in a group of 21 healthy volunteers. RESULTS T2 of the infarct zone was 69 ± 6 ms compared with 56 ± 3.4 ms for remote myocardium (p < 0.0001). No difference in T2 was observed between remote myocardium and myocardium of healthy volunteers (56 ± 3.4 ms and 55.5 ± 2.3 ms, respectively, p = NS). T2 mapping allowed for the detection of edematous myocardium in 26 of 27 patients; by comparison, segmented breath-hold T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery images were negative in 7 and uninterpretable in another 2 due to breathing artifacts. Within the infarct zone, areas of microvascular obstruction were characterized by a lower T2 value (59 ± 6 ms) compared with areas with no microvascular obstruction (71.6 ± 10 ms, p < 0.0001). T2 mapping provided consistent high-quality results in patients unable to breath-hold and in those with irregular heart rhythms, in whom short tau inversion recovery often yielded inadequate imaging. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative T2 mapping reliably identifies myocardial edema without the limitations encountered by T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery imaging, and may therefore be clinically more robust in showing acute ischemic injury.

Background T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is useful in diagnosing acute inflammatory myocardial diseases such as myocarditis and tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTCM). We hypothesized that quantitative T2 mapping could better delineate myocardial involvement in these disorders vs. T2-weighted imaging. Methods and Results Thirty patients with suspected myocarditis or TTCM referred for CMR who met established diagnostic criteria underwent myocardial T2 mapping. T2 values were averaged in involved and remote myocardial segments, both defined by a reviewer blinded to T2 data. In myocarditis, T2 was 65.2±3.2ms in the involved myocardium vs. 53.5±2.1 in remote myocardium (p<0.001). In TTCM, T2 was 65.6±4.0ms in the involved myocardium vs. 53.6±2.7ms in remote segments (p<0.001). T2 values were similar across remote myocardial segments in patients and all myocardial segments in controls (p>0.05 for all). T2 maps provided diagnostic data even in patients with difficulty breath-holding. A T2 cutoff of 59ms identified areas of myocardial involvement with sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 97%, respectively. T2 mapping revealed regions of abnormal T2 beyond those identified by wall motion abnormalities or LGE-positivity. Conventional T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery (T2W-STIR) images were uninterpretable in 7 patients due to artifact and unremarkable in 2 who had elevated T2 values. T2-prepared steady state free precession (T2p-SSFP) images showed areas of signal hyperintensity in only17/30 patients. Conclusions Quantitative T2 mapping reliably identifies myocardial involvement in patients with myocarditis and TTCM. T2 mapping delineated greater extent of myocardial disease in both conditions compared to that identified by wall motion abnormalities, T2W-STIR, T2p-SSFP or LGE. Quantitative T2 mapping warrants consideration as a robust technique to identify myocardial injury in patients with acute myocarditis or TTCM.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract