Corticosteroid dosing in the range of 0.5–2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone equivalents has become a standard part of the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia based on positive results of randomized trials and a meta‐analysis. Alongside such conventional dosing, administration of 1 gm of methylprednisolone daily (pulse dosing) has also been reported in the literature with claims of favorable outcomes. Comparisons between such disparate approaches to corticosteroids for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pneumonia are lacking. In this retrospective study of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID‐19 pneumonia, we compared patients treated with 0.5–2 mg/kg/day in methylprednisolone equivalents (high‐dose corticosteroids) and patients treated with 1 gm of methylprednisolone (pulse‐dose corticosteroids) to those who did not receive any corticosteroids. The endpoints of interest were hospital mortality, ICU‐free days at Day 28, and complications potentially attributable to corticosteroids. Pulse‐dose corticosteroid therapy was associated with a significant increase in ICU‐free days at Day 28 compared to no receipt: adjusted relative risk (aRR): 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–2.02; p = 0.03) and compared with high‐dose corticosteroid administration (p = 0.003). Nonetheless, receipt of high‐dose corticosteroids—but not of pulse‐dose corticosteroids—significantly reduced the odds of hospital mortality compared to no receipt: adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12–0.77; p = 0.01). High‐dose corticosteroids reduced mortality compared to pulse‐dose corticosteroids (p = 0.04). Pulse‐dose corticosteroids—but not high‐dose corticosteroids—significantly increased the odds of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy compared to no receipt: aOR 3.53 (95% CI: 1.27–9.82; p = 0.02). The odds of this complication were also significantly higher in the pulse‐dose group when compared to the high‐dose group (p = 0.05 for the comparison). In this single‐center study, pulse‐dose corticosteroid therapy for COVID‐19 pneumonia in the ICU was associated with an increase in ICU‐free days but failed to impact hospital mortality, perhaps because of its association with development of severe renal failure. In line with existing trial data, the effect of high‐dose corticosteroids on mortality was favorable.

Background: Radiographic markers of skeletal maturity are vital to the prediction and interpretation of skeletal growth patterns. Accurate predictions of skeletal maturity factor into the management of common musculoskeletal disorders. Bone age is conventionally measured using hand and wrist radiographs. The primary study objective was to optimize skeletal maturity estimates based on the morphology of markers at the hip, knee, and foot rather than conventional upper extremity radiographs. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of children from the Bolton-Brush collection with anteroposterior radiographs of the hip and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee and foot, and heights recorded at the time of each radiograph. The percent growth achieved (%GA) was calculated as a function of final patient height. Poor quality radiographs were excluded, leaving 50 patients-32 females and 18 males-and 1068 radiographs for analysis. Skeletal maturity was evaluated using the Oxford bone, O'Connor knee, and calcaneal apophyseal scores. Interrater and intrarater reliability analyses were performed for hip and knee scores. Multiple linear regressions were conducted on these scores and chronologic age as predictors of %GA. Mean differences were calculated between actual and estimated %GAs. All analyses were performed in Prism 8.0. Results: Each lower extremity skeletal maturity score served as statistically significant, independent predictors of %GA, the accuracy and strength of which increased with the addition of chronologic age. The integration of all 3 systems and chronologic age yielded the most predictive, accurate model predictive of % GA, which can be used to determine percent growth remaining. However, this fully integrated system was not statistically superior to the combination of knee and foot scores and knee score and chronologic age, which yield similarly accurate %GA predictions. The hip and knee systems demonstrated good to excellent interrater and intrarater reliability. Conclusions: Integration of bone age scores across different regions of the lower extremity has the potential to facilitate orthopaedic decision-making using radiographs already obtained in the treatment of pediatric musculoskeletal conditions. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

No abstract

No abstract