No abstract

Academic technology transfer in its current form began with the passage of the Bayh–Dole Act in 1980, which allowed universities to retain ownership of federally funded intellectual property. Since that time, a profession has evolved that has transformed how inventions arising in universities are treated, resulting in significant impact to US society. While there have been a number of articles highlighting benefits of technology transfer, now, more than at any other time since the Bayh–Dole Act was passed, the profession and the impacts of this groundbreaking legislation have come under intense scrutiny. This article serves as an examination of the many positive benefits and evolution, both financial and intrinsic, provided by academic invention and technology transfer, summarized in Table 1.

We evaluated the anxiolytic property of a brain-specific gamma-aminobutyric acid delivery system (GABA-CDS) in male rats by means of a drink-foot shock conflict procedure. Brain-specific delivery of the active compound was achieved by combination of GABA benzyl ester with an interconvertible dihydropyridine in equilibrium pyridinium salt carrier, which is "locked in" to the brain upon its oxidation. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that the hydrophilic pyridinium salt form (G-Q+) of the GABA-CDS formed in situ remained in the brain for 12 h but was cleared from the blood and other peripheral tissues by 0.5-4 h. While the lipophilic form (G-DH) of the GABA-CDS caused a marked and sustained anxiolytic response when administered systemically, GABA and the charged pyridinium salt (G-Q+ form) of the GABA-CDS were ineffective. G-DH was injected at either 0, 4, 10 or 25 mg/kg IV in DMSO after rats were water and food deprived. After either 0.5, 2, 4, 8 or 24 h, rats were permitted 10 s of shock-free drinking of 10% sucrose, then given a 35 mA (DC) current through the drinking tube. Drinking time was recorded for 3 min. All doses of G-DH caused a significant increase in anxiolysis over control levels through 8 h. An increase (4 to 7-fold) in anxiolytic activity was observed through the 10 mg/kg dose with the 25 mg/kg dose causing no additional increase. No sedation or analgesia was observed at 2 h with any anxiolytic-producing dose of G-DH. These results suggest that G-DH elicits anxiolysis with minimal sedation, through the local brain action the G-Q+ or subsequent to the release of GABA.

No abstract

No abstract