Cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to atherosclerosis of the arterial vessel wall and to thrombosis is the foremost cause of premature mortality and of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in Europe, and is also increasingly common in developing countries.1 In the European Union, the economic cost of CVD represents annually E192 billion1 in direct and indirect healthcare costs. The main clinical entities are coronary artery disease (CAD), ischaemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The causes of these CVDs are multifactorial. Some of these factors relate to lifestyles, such as tobacco smoking, lack of physical activity, and dietary habits, and are thus modifiable. Other risk factors are also modifiable, such as elevated blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidaemias, or non-modifiable, such as age and male gender. These guidelines deal with the management of dyslipidaemias as an essential and integral part of CVD prevention. Prevention and treatment of dyslipidaemias should always be considered within the broader framework of CVD prevention, which is addressed in guidelines of the Joint European Societies’ Task forces on CVD prevention in clinical practice.2 – 5 The latest version of these guidelines was published in 20075; an update will become available in 2012. These Joint ESC/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias are complementary to the guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice and address not only physicians [e.g. general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists] interested in CVD prevention, but also specialists from lipid clinics or metabolic units who are dealing with dyslipidaemias that are more difficult to classify and treat.

No abstract

Содержание данных рекомендаций, подготовленных Европейским обществом кардиологов (European Society of Cardiology, ESC) и Европейским обществом атеросклероза (European Atherosclerosis Society, EAS) опубликовано исключи-тельно для использования в личных и образовательных целях. Не допускается коммерческое использование содержания рекомендаций. Рекомендации ESC не могут быть переведены на другие языки либо воспроизведены, полностью или частично, без письменного согласия ESC. Для получения данного согласия письменная заявка должна быть направлена в Oxford University Press -органи-зацию, издающую European Heart Journal и официально уполномоченную ESC, рассматривать подобные заявки.Отказ от ответственности. Рекомендации ESC отражают взгляды ESC и EAS и основаны на тщательном анализе научных данных, доступных во время под-готовки данных рекомендаций. Медицинским работникам следует придержи-ваться данных рекомендаций в процессе принятия клинических решений. В то же время, рекомендации не могут заменить личную ответственность медицинских работников при принятии клинических решений с учетом инди-видуальных особенностей и предпочтений пациентов и, при необходимости, предпочтений их опекунов и попечителей. Медицинские работники также несут ответственность в отношении дополнительной проверки всех надлежа-щих требований и правил перед назначением лекарственных средств и использованием медицинского оборудования. Ключевые слова: дислипидемии, холестерин, триглицериды, липопротеиды низкой плотности, липопротеиды высокой плотности, апобелок В, общий кар-диоваскулярный риск, лечение, образ жизни, лекарства, приверженность.

Background: Hyperglycaemia is associated with poor outcomes from pneumonia, myocardial infarction and stroke, but the effect of blood glucose on outcomes from acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) has not been established. Recent UK guidelines do not comment on measurement or control of blood glucose in AECOPD. A study was therefore undertaken to determine the relationship between blood glucose concentrations, length of stay in hospital, and mortality in patients admitted with AECOPD. Methods: Data were retrieved from electronic records for patients admitted with AECOPD with lower respiratory tract infection in 2001-2. The patients were grouped according to blood glucose quartile (group 1, ,6 mmol/l (n = 69); group 2, 6.0-6.9 mmol/l (n = 69); group 3, 7.0-8.9 mmol/l (n = 75); and group 4, .9.0 mmol/l (n = 71)). Results: The relative risk (RR) of death or long inpatient stay was significantly increased in group 3 (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.02, p = 0.02) and group 4 (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.92, p,0.0001) compared with group 1. For each 1 mmol/l increase in blood glucose the absolute risk of adverse outcomes increased by 15% (95% CI 4 to 27), p = 0.006. The risk of adverse outcomes increased with increasing hyperglycaemia independent of age, sex, a previous diagnosis of diabetes, and COPD severity. Isolation of multiple pathogens and Staphylococcus aureus from sputum also increased with increasing blood glucose. Conclusion: Increasing blood glucose concentrations are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AECOPD. Tight control of blood glucose reduces mortality in patients in intensive care or following myocardial infarction. A prospective study is now required to determine whether control of blood glucose can also improve outcomes from AECOPD.

No abstract