After menopause, both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure (BP) become higher in women than in men of the same age, suggesting that estrogen deficiency may influence the age-related increase in BP. We studied 30 postmenopausal women (mean age, 55 +/- 5.7 years; time from menopause, 2-5 years) affected by mild hypertension with no target-organ complications by means of 24-h BP monitoring. None of the group were undergoing estrogen replacement therapy or taking antihypertensive drugs. According to a randomized, double-blind protocol, subjects received patches of transdermal estradiol-17beta (E2) or a matched placebo, with crossover after a 7-day washout period. In 12 patients the 24-h peak-to-trough variation in SBP and DBP amounted to less than 10% (nondippers). Administration of E2 significantly decreased 24-h SBP and DBP in the whole cohort (P < .05). Furthermore, E2 restored the expected reduction in BP during nighttime in the nondipper subgroup. It is well known that estrogen replacement therapy protects against the development of both cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Our data suggest that this activity could be attributed, at least in part, to the activity of E2 in preserving physiologic circadian fluctuation of BP.

BackgroundInsulin resistance (IR) is currently considered a crucial cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, which seems to play a dominant role in the evolution toward cardiac and vascular impairment. Early IR-induced cardiac dysfunction can be assessed by Doppler-derived myocardial systolic strain rate (SR) index, measured at baseline and after dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).MethodsThirty IR patients (HOMA-IR = 7 ± 5.2, age 52.6 ± 2.1 years), and 20 healthy, age and sex matched controls were studied. IR had been diagnosed in all patients in the 3 months preceding the study. Dobutamine echocardiography was performed in all subjects to exclude ischemic heart disease, and left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) was then assessed. LVCR was evaluated as an increase in the peak of an average longitudinal SR, measured in the basal and mid segments of 2 and 4 chamber ventricular walls.ResultsNo significant differences between the 2 groups were revealed by baseline echocardiography. In contrast, after DSE a significant decrease of Delta SR was found in the IR group in comparison to the controls (0.54 ± 0.31 s−1vs 1.14 ± 0.45 s−1; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsOur results show that IR, even if isolated and arising within a short time period, not only represents the initial phase of future diabetes, but may adversely affect heart function, as evidenced by the depressed LVCR. Our data strengthen the need for attention to be paid to IR state and for an early therapeutic approach.