In this study, polystyrene (PS) was melt blended with different amounts of poly1‐hexene (PH) and poly(1‐hexene‐co‐hexadiene) (COPOLY) and the blends were compared with conventional PS/polybutadiene (PS/PB) one. Scanning electron microscope revealed that the dispersion of PH and COPOLY in PS matrix was more uniform with the appearance of small particles in PS matrix; however, in the case of PS/PB blends, the fracture surface showed nonhomogenous morphology with the appearance of bigger rubber particles. Based on Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis results, Tg of the blends decreased in comparison with it in neat PS. Impact strength of PS/PH and PS/COPOLY blends was considerably higher than that in PS/PB and significantly higher than the value for neat PS. Tensile test showed substantial improvement in stress at yield and better elongation at break for COPOLY containing blend than the samples containing PH and PB rubbers. Also, blending of PS with 10% of the rubbers was considered in the presence of dicumylperoxide as a probable grafting/cross‐linking agent to produce XPS/COPOLY10 and XPS/PB10 samples, respectively. IR results of the nonsoluble solvent extracted gel showed that COPOLY and PB were grafted to PS matrix during melt blending, which caused higher impact strength in the related samples.

No abstract