The Amur leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) is a critically endangered top predator that struggles on the brink of extinction due to threats such as canine distemper virus (CDV), habitat loss, and inbreeding depression. Here we develop a viability analysis metamodel that combines a traditional individual-based demographic model with an epidemiological model to assess the benefits of alternative population management actions in response to multiple distinct threats. Our results showed an extinction risk of 10.3%-99.9% if no management actions were taken over 100 years under different levels of inbreeding depression. Reducing the risk of CDV infection in Amur leopards through the low-coverage vaccination of leopards and the management of sympatric domestic dogs could effectively improve the survival probability of the leopard population, and with habitat expansion added to these management measures, the population expanded further. Our findings highlight that protecting the Amur leopard necessitates a multifaceted synergistic effort, and controlling multiple threats together may significantly escalate overall viability of a species, especially for small-isolated threatened population. More broadly, our modeling framework could offer critical perspectives and scientific support for conservation planning, as well as specific adaptive management actions for endangered species around the world.

No abstract

Forest spatial structure has always been an important topic of ecological research. Large trees directly affect the spatial patterns in forest stands. In this study, we used the data from seven sample plots in natural mixed forests of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Siebold & Zucc.) and broad-leaved trees in Heilongjiang Province, China, to examine the effect of large trees on the spatial distribution of adjacent trees and to explore whether this effect is related to the gap dynamics theory. We classified trees with wide diameter (diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 50 cm) as central trees and then surveyed the distribution of adjacent trees around each central tree. The results revealed a ring structure of small trees (size class 2 (5.0 ≤ DBH < 10.0 cm) and size class 3 (10.0 ≤ DBH < 30.0 cm)) surrounding large trees. In the two northern sample plots, the trees formed the ring structures with radii of 4–7 m from the large-diameter trees. In the two central sample plots, the ring structures had the radii of 5–9 m and 5–8 m. Analogously, in the three southern sample plots, the ring structures had the radii of 7–11 m and 6–10 m. The formation of a ring structure is closely related to the competition among individuals, and there is an internal relationship between the formation of this structure and the dynamic theory.