No abstract

This study aimed to test the acceptability, cultural appropriateness, consumers' understanding, and practicality of the Ethiopian food-based dietary guideline's messages, tips, and food graphics. A qualitative study design was applied with focus group discussions and key informant interviews. Four different participant groups were included: 40 consumers, 15 high-level nutrition experts, 30 frontline community health extension workers (HEWs), and 15 agriculture extension workers (AEWs) to incorporate different stakeholder perspectives. Data collection was conducted using 7 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 30 key informant interviews (KIIs). Collected data were coded and analyzed using QSR International NVivo V.11 software. Most of the study participants were highly interested in implementing the dietary guidelines once these guidelines are officially released. Based on the participants' views, most of the messages align with the current nutrition education materials implemented in the country except the messages about physical activity and alcohol intake. However, participants suggested defining technical terms such as ultra-processing, whole grain, safe and balanced diet in simpler terms for a better understanding. Practicality, affordability, availability, and access to the market were the major barriers reported for adherence to the guidelines. To be more inclusive of cultural and religious beliefs, findings show that the guideline should address fasting and traditional cooking methods. In conclusion, the dietary guidelines were well received by most stakeholders. They are thought to be feasible once feedback on wording, affordability, availability, and access is considered in the messages, tips, and graphic designs.

Objectives Despite much nutrition research conducted in Ethiopia, none has described existing opportunities for synergy or possible missed opportunities to use research to inform policy and program decisions to foster accelerated progress. The study aimed to describe prevailing processes on evidence use in formulating nutrition policy and program decisions and identify potential barriers and opportunities for evidence-based decision-making for nutrition for Ethiopia's context. Methods In 2017, 29 purposively selected key informants (KIs) were interviewed. They were identified using a consultative stakeholder mapping workshop and represented National Nutrition Program coordinators, key actors in government sectors, program coordinators from selected local and international NGOs, local and international universities and research institutes involved in nutrition research and key actors in policy decision-making. A framework analysis including identifying themes, coding, indexing, charting, mapping and interpretation was used. A validation workshop discussed findings and added perspectives to interpretation. Results The KIs perceived that demand for evidence from the Ethiopian government had been increasing over time. Majority referred to poor research quality as a barrier for using research in decision-making processes. Other challenges identified included limited cross-linkage, coordination gaps between researchers and decision makers, and inadequate translation of research evidence into meaningful information for policy makers. Availability of different forums, research dissemination conferences and suitable institutional structures that enable research and evidence dissemination were considered to be opportunities that should be leveraged to inform policy making. Conclusions The quality of research, and of collaborative engagement between those who produce evidence and decision makers who formulate policies need to be strengthened. Regular evidence dissemination events and publication of action oriented easy to read briefs could increase use of evidence among nutrition policy makers. Funding Sources Ethiopian Public Health Institute and Evidence-informed Decision-making in Health and Nutrition Network.

Objectives Ethiopia has been hesitant to shift to the global MUAC-based definitions for acute malnutrition given the two to four times potential increase in caseload suggested by several cross-sectional surveys. Thus, the objective of this study was to provide specific evidence on the caseload implications for Ethiopia of aligning with the WHO recommended criteria. Methods A cluster-randomized control study was conducted in four districts of Amhara and Oromia regions of Ethiopia in a total of 36 health posts (HPs). Districts and HPs were selected based on previous high case report. In each district, an equal numbers of HPs were randomly assigned to use either the global MUAC criteria of <11.5 cm for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and the moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) criteria of ≥11.5cm to <12.5 cm (intervention) or the current Ethiopian criteria of <11 cm for SAM and ≥11 cm to <12 cm for MAM (control). All 6–59 mo children were screened regularly for 16 wks. Malnourished children were admitted to the study according to the criteria assigned to their HP. Results A total of 349 SAM and 986 MAM new cases were admitted during the 16 wk recruitment. Of the new SAM cases, 225 were in intervention and 124 were in control HPs. The ratio of SAM in intervention compared to control HPs was 1.78 (1.14–2.42, 95%CI), which indicates an increase in admissions of 78% (P = 0.019). The mean (±SD) monthly SAM admissions per HPs were 1.71 (0.53) in control and 2.97 (3.31) in intervention (P = 0.191). For MAM, 592 cases were in intervention and 394 were in control for a ratio of 1.50 (1.11–1.89). The global MUAC criteria increased caseload by 50% (P = 0.015) compared to control. The mean monthly new MAM admissions per HPs were 5.47 (4.02) in control and 8.22 (3.28) in intervention (P = 0.045). The mean number of children served during biweekly combined sessions for SAM and MAM was 19.67 (9.28) in intervention and 13.08 (8.28) in control (P = 0.026). For sessions restricted to SAM, a mean of 4.26 (4.11) was served in intervention and 1.92 (1.88) in control (P = 0.028). Conclusions The increases in cases and workload resulting from shifting from Ethiopia's current national SAM and MAM admission and discharge criteria to the WHO criteria are likely to be on a smaller scale than is usually claimed based on various cross-sectional surveys. Most HPs were not overwhelmed due to the shift. Funding Sources Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Objective: To develop a healthy diet for Ethiopian women closely resembling their current diet and taking fasting periods into account while tracking the cost difference. Design: Linear goal programming models were built for three scenarios (non-fasting, continuous fasting, and intermittent fasting). Each model minimized a function of deviations from nutrient reference values for 11 nutrients (protein, calcium, iron, zinc, folate, and the vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B6, and B12). The energy intake in optimized diets could only deviate 5% from the current diet. Settings: Five regions are included in the urban and rural areas of Ethiopia. Participants: Two non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls (24HDR) were collected from 494 Ethiopian women of reproductive age from November-December 2019. Results: Women’s mean energy intake was well above 2000 kcal across all socio-demographic sub-groups. Compared to the current diet, the estimated intake of several food groups was considerably higher in the optimized modelled diets, i.e., milk and dairy foods (396 versus 30 g/day), nuts and seeds (20 versus 1 g/day), and fruits (200 versus 7 g/day). Except for calcium and vitamin B12 intake in the continuous fasting diet, the proposed diets provide an adequate intake of the targeted micronutrients. The proposed diets had a maximum cost of 120 Ethiopian birrs ($3.5) per day, twice the current diet’s cost. Conclusion: The modelled diets may be feasible for women of reproductive age as they are close to their current diets and fulfill their energy and nutrient demands. However, the costs may be a barrier to implementation.