The TIO and HIO provide rapid and reliable access to administer life-saving medications during cardiac arrest.

The SIO and IV routes of amiodarone administration were comparable. The TIO group took nearly three times longer to reach Tmax than the SIO and IV groups, likely indicating depot of lipid-soluble amiodarone in adipose-rich tibial yellow bone marrow. The SIO route was more effective than the TIO route for amiodarone delivery in a swine model of VF with ongoing CPR. Further investigations are necessary to determine if the kinetic differences found between the SIO and TIO routes in this study affect survival of VF in humans.

When IV access is difficult, both HIO and SIO are effective techniques for rapid vascular access and the administration of Hextend for patients in hypovolemic shock.

There was a statistically significant delay in the time to ROSC and a clinically significant difference in odds of ROSC when resuscitative drugs, including lipophilic amiodarone, were administered by the TIO route compared to the SIO and IV routes in a swine model of sudden cardiac arrest. Further investigations are warranted to isolate the mechanism behind these findings.

ObjectiveWe compared the efficacy of tibial intraosseous (TIO) administration of epinephrine in a pediatric normovolemic versus hypovolemic cardiac arrest model to determine the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and plasma epinephrine concentrations over time.MethodsThis experimental study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of epinephrine and/or incidence of ROSC after TIO administration in either a normovolemic or hypovolemic pediatric swine model.ResultsAll subjects in the TIO normovolemia cardiac arrest group experienced ROSC after TIO administration of epinephrine. In contrast, subjects experiencing hypovolemia and cardiac arrest were significantly less likely to experience ROSC when epinephrine was administered TIO versus intravenous (TIO hypovolemia: 14% [1/7] vs IV hypovolemia: 71% [5/7]; P = 0.031). The TIO hypovolemia group exhibited significantly lower plasma epinephrine concentrations versus IV hypovolemia at 60, 90, 120, and 150 seconds (P < 0.05). Although the maximum concentration of plasma epinephrine was similar, the TIO hypovolemia group exhibited significantly slower time to maximum concentration times versus TIO normovolemia subjects (P = 0.004).ConclusionsTibial intraosseous administration of epinephrine reliably facilitated ROSC among normovolemic cardiac arrest pediatric patients, which is consistent with published reports. However, TIO administration of epinephrine was ineffective in restoring ROSC among subjects experiencing hypovolemia and cardiac arrest. Tibial intraosseous–administered epinephrine during hypovolemia and cardiac arrest may have resulted in a potential sequestration of epinephrine in the tibia. Central or peripheral intravascular access attempts should not be abandoned after successful TIO placement in the resuscitation of patients experiencing concurrent hypovolemia and cardiac arrest.