BACKGROUNDPrevious trials have shown that among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, survival rates are similar with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aorticvalve replacement. We evaluated the two procedures in a randomized trial involving intermediate-risk patients. METHODSWe randomly assigned 2032 intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, at 57 centers, to undergo either TAVR or surgical replacement. The primary end point was death from any cause or disabling stroke at 2 years. The primary hypothesis was that TAVR would not be inferior to surgical replacement. Before randomization, patients were entered into one of two cohorts on the basis of clinical and imaging findings; 76.3% of the patients were included in the transfemoral-access cohort and 23.7% in the transthoracic-access cohort. RESULTSThe rate of death from any cause or disabling stroke was similar in the TAVR group and the surgery group (P = 0.001 for noninferiority). At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier event rates were 19.3% in the TAVR group and 21.1% in the surgery group (hazard ratio in the TAVR group, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.09; P = 0.25). In the transfemoralaccess cohort, TAVR resulted in a lower rate of death or disabling stroke than surgery (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.00; P = 0.05), whereas in the transthoracic-access cohort, outcomes were similar in the two groups. TAVR resulted in larger aortic-valve areas than did surgery and also resulted in lower rates of acute kidney injury, severe bleeding, and new-onset atrial fibrillation; surgery resulted in fewer major vascular complications and less paravalvular aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONSIn intermediate-risk patients, TAVR was similar to surgical aortic-valve replacement with respect to the primary end point of death or disabling stroke. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PARTNER 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01314313.) a bs tr ac t

In this randomized clinical trial involving patients with complex coronary lesions, the use of a sirolimus-eluting stent had a consistent treatment effect, reducing the rates of restenosis and associated clinical events in all subgroups analyzed.

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended after coronary stenting to prevent thrombotic complications, yet the benefits and risks of treatment beyond 1 year are uncertain. Methods Subjects were enrolled after a drug-eluting coronary stent procedure. After 12 months of thienopyridine (clopidogrel bisulfate [Plavix] or prasugrel [Effient/Efient]) with aspirin, subjects were randomized to continued thienopyridine or placebo for another 18 months; all continued aspirin. The co-primary effectiveness end points were stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 12 to 30 months. The primary safety end point was moderate or severe bleeding. Results Subjects (N=9,961) were randomized to continued thienopyridine or placebo. Continued thienopyridine reduced stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.4%, hazard ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.48, P<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (4.3% vs. 5.9%, hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, P<0.001). Myocardial infarction was reduced (2.1% vs. 4.1%, hazard ratio 0.47, P<0.001). Rates of all-cause mortality in the continued thienopyridine and placebo groups were 2.0 and 1.5%, respectively (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.85, P=0.052). Moderate or severe bleeding was increased with continued thienopyridine (2.5% vs. 1.6%, P=0.001). An elevated hazard for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction was observed in both groups during the 3 months following thienopyridine discontinuation. Conclusion Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond one year after drug-eluting stent placement significantly reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared with aspirin alone, but was associated with increased bleeding.

The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin treatment reduces ischemic events in a wide range of patients with cardiovascular disease. However, recurrent ischemic event occurrence during dual antiplatelet therapy, including stent thrombosis, remains a major concern. Platelet function measurements during clopidogrel treatment demonstrated a variable and overall modest level of P2Y(12) inhibition. High on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was observed in selected patients. Multiple studies have now demonstrated a clear association between high on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP measured by multiple methods and adverse clinical event occurrence. However, the routine measurement of platelet reactivity has not been widely implemented and recommended in the guidelines. Reasons for the latter include: 1) a lack of consensus on the optimal method to quantify high on-treatment platelet reactivity and the cutoff value associated with clinical risk; and 2) limited data to support that alteration of therapy based on platelet function measurements actually improves outcomes. This review provides a consensus opinion on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP based on various methods reported in the literature and proposes how this measurement may be used in the future care of patients.

Background-Ticagrelor is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y 12 receptor antagonist. This is the first study to compare the onset and offset of platelet inhibition (IPA) with ticagrelor using the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) trial loading dose (180 mg) with a high loading dose (600 mg) of clopidogrel. 0001).At 24 hours after the last dose, mean IPA was 58% for ticagrelor versus 52% for clopidogrel (PϭNS). IPA for ticagrelor on day 3 after the last dose was comparable to clopidogrel at day 5; IPA on day 5 for ticagrelor was similar to clopidogrel on day 7 and did not differ from placebo (PϭNS). Conclusions-Ticagrelor achieved more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than high-loading-dose clopidogrel; this was sustained during the maintenance phase and was faster in offset after drug discontinuation. Clinical Trial Registration Information-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00528411.