Interest in structure-based G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand discovery is huge, given that almost 30 % of all approved drugs belong to this category of active compounds. The GPCR family includes the dopamine receptor subtype D2 (D2DR), but unfortunately--as is true of most GPCRs--no experimental structures are available for these receptors. In this publication, we present the molecular model of D2DR based on the previously published crystal structure of the dopamine D3 receptor (D3DR). A molecular modeling study using homology modeling and docking simulation provided a rational explanation for the behavior of the arylpiperazine ligand. The observed binding modes and receptor-ligand interactions provided us with fresh clues about how to optimize selectivity for D2DR receptors.

Clinical properties of atypical antipsychotics are based on their interaction with D(2) dopamine receptor and serotonin 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A) receptors. As a part of our research program on new antipsychotics, we synthesized various derivatives of 1-cinnamyl-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazines, and evaluated their affinities for D(2), 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A), and adrenergic (alpha(1)) receptors using radioligand-binding assays. In addition, we performed docking analysis using models for the D(2) and 5-HT(1A) receptors. All compounds exhibited low to moderate affinity to 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A) receptors, high affinity to the D(2 )receptor and large variability in affinities for the alpha(1) receptor. Docking analysis indicated that the binding to D(2) and 5-HT(1A) receptors is based on (i) interaction between protonated N1 of the piperazine ring and various aspartate residues, (ii) hydrogen bonds between various moieties of the ligand and the residues of threonine, serine, histidine or tryptophane, and (iii) edge-to-face interactions of the aromatic ring of the arylpiperazine moiety with phenylalanine or tyrosine residues. Docking data for the D(2) receptor can account for the binding properties obtained in binding assays, suggesting that the model is reliable and robust. However, docking data for the 5-HT(1A) receptor cannot account for actual binding properties, suggesting that further refinement of the model is required.

No abstract

The docking of several 1-benzyl-4-arylpiperazines to the dopamine receptor (DAR) D 2 was examined. The results demonstrated that the interaction of protonated N1 of the piperazine ring with Asp 86 (III.32) and edge-to-face interactions of the aromatic ring of the arylpiperazine part of the ligand with Phe 178 (VI.44), Trp 182 (VI.48) and Tyr 216 (VII.58) of the receptor, represent the major stabilizing forces. Besides, the hydrogen bond acceptor group in position 2 of the phenylpiperazine aromatic ring could build one more hydrogen bond with Trp 182 (VI.48). Bulky substituents in position 4 were not tolerated due to the unfavorable sterical interaction with Phe 178 (VI.44). Substituents in position 2 and 3 were found to be sterically well tolerated. Introduction of electron attractive -NO 2 group in position 3 of arylpiperazines decreased, while electron donors (-OMe) and the second aromatic ring (naphthyl) increased the binding affinity comparing to that of the phenylpiperazine 1. This can be explained in terms of favoured edge-to-face interactions in ligands with a high negative electrostatic surface potential (ESP) in the centre of aromatic residue of arylpiperazines. Zusammenfassung Interaktion von Arylpiperazinen mit der Dopamin D 2 -Rezeptorbindungsstelle Die Bindung von mehreren 1-Benzyl-4-arylpiperazin-Derivaten an den Dopamin D 2 -Rezeptor wurde untersucht. Die Thus, besides the salt bridges and hydrogen bonds, edge-to-face interactions significantly contribute to arylpiperazine ligands to form complexes with the DAR D 2 . Phe 178 (VI.44), Trp 182 (VI.48) and Tyr 216 (VII.58) can be considered as a part of the ancillary DAR D 2 pocket preserved in most G protein-coupled receptors of the A class and obviously, the arylpiperazine structural motif represents one of the privileged structures that bind to this pocket. Ergebnisse zeigen, daß die Interaktion des protonierten N1 des Piperazin-Rings mit Asp 86 (III.32) und "Edge-to-Face"-Interaktionen des aromatischen Rings des Acrylpiperazin-Anteils mit Phe 178 (VI.44), Trp 182 (VI.48) und Tyr 216

A quantitative structure-retention relationship study has been performed to correlate the retention of 33 newly synthesized arylpiperazines with their molecular characteristics, using thin-layer chromatography. Principal component analysis followed by multiple linear regression (MLR), principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares (PLS) was performed to identify the most important factors, to quantify their influences, and to select descriptors that best describe the behavior of the compounds investigated. The best statistical performance was achieved by applying PLS regression, leading to the lowest value of the standard error (root mean square errors of calibration of 0.159 and cross-validated value RMSE cross-validation=0.231 units), followed by the PCR (root mean square errors of calibration=0.195 and RMSE cross-validation=0.305) and MLR (R(adj)(2)=0.9499, F=102.017, mean square error=0.052 and predicted residual error sum of squares=2.23). Two factors of the highest influence: surface tension and hydrophilic-lipophilic balance appear as the part of obtained models. In addition, polar surface area and hydrophilic surface area are included by both PLS and PCR models. Moreover, logP has been added to the PLS model. Besides, PCR model includes following descriptors: hydrogen bond acceptor, hydrogen bond donor and LUMO energy, whereas topological descriptors: connectivity indices 0 and 2, and valence index 3 are included in the MLR model.