In Experiment 1, male and female subjects were given an opportunity to snack as they participated in a "get-acquainted study" with a same-sex or opposite-sex partner (confederate) whose social desirability was manipulated. Consistent with the hypothesis that women may eat less when motivated to present themselves in a feminine light, female subjects ate significantly less with a desirable male partner than in the remaining three conditions. In contrast, male subjects did not eat more (or less) with a desirable woman, although they did show an overall tendency to eat less with female (vs. male) partners. In Experiment 2, female subjects snacked as they got acquainted with a desirable male partner (confederate). Before this interaction, subjects received feedback indicating that they had either very masculine or very feminine interests. In addition, subjects believed either that their male partner was aware of their gender feedback or that he was unaware. Consistent with predictions derived from Schlenker's (1982) analytic-identity theory of social conduct, subjects in the partner-aware conditions ate less when they had received masculine (vs. feminine) feedback, whereas subjects in the partner-unaware conditions ate less when they had received feminine (vs. masculine) feedback. Implications for understanding eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia are discussed.

US troops were deployed to the Persian Gulf in what became known as the Gulf War. Upon their return, many Gulf War veterans from both the US and other allied forces began to report chronic, unexplained fatigue, pain, Author Affiliations are listed at the end of this article. Members of the VA Cooperative Study #470 Study Group and the data and safety monitoring board are listed in reference 14 of this article.

Morbid obesity is a rapidly escalating problem in the United States, one with serious health ramifications. Due to the lack of empirical support for the long-term efficacy of non-surgical interventions for obesity, gastric bypass surgery has been pursued with increasing frequency as a treatment for morbid obesity. Because surgery is a high-risk, invasive treatment option, medical, psychological and behavioral factors must be carefully considered in pre-surgical evaluations. Although psychological evaluations are requested by surgical teams, there is currently no commonly used, standardized protocol for this type of assessment. Further, there is little empirical data specifying which factors predict successful surgical outcomes. A general overview of a semi-structured interview for pre-surgical gastric bypass evaluation, developed by the Medical Psychology Service at the VA Boston Healthcare System, is provided in this paper. This standardized approach has many advantages: it ensures comprehensive assessment of relevant factors; it facilitates both research and training; and it facilitates patient education about the procedure.

No abstract