No abstract

The cohesin complex is responsible for the accurate separation of sister chromatids into two daughter cells. Several models for the cohesin complex have been proposed, but the one-ring embrace model currently predominates the field. However, the static configuration of the embrace model is not flexible enough for cohesins to perform their functions during DNA replication, transcription, and DNA repair. We used coimmunoprecipitation, a protein fragment complement assay, and a yeast two-hybrid assay to analyze the protein–protein interactions among cohesin subunits. The results show that three of the four human cohesin core subunits (Smc1, Smc3, and Rad21) interact with themselves in an Scc3 (SA1/SA2)-dependent manner. These data support a two-ring handcuff model for the cohesin complex, which is flexible enough to establish and maintain sister chromatid cohesion as well as ensure the fidelity of chromosome segregation in higher eukaryotes.

A neuploidy (aberrant chromosome number) is a hallmark feature of human malignancies (1, 2) and has also been proposed as a necessary event for tumorigenesis (2). Although there have been many proposed hypotheses, there is no general agreement as to why aneuploidy is so highly prevalent in cancer cells, and how it contributes to tumor progression (3, 4). Importantly, if aneuploidy forms an underlying cause of human cancer, it has not been fully substantiated. The mechanisms of aneuploidy also remain a fundamental unresolved problem in cancer biology.To understand how aneuploidy might originate in mammalian tissues, we have focused on the elements that regulate chromosomal segregation, particularly those involved in sister chromatid cohesion and separation, because chromosome missegregation, for example during mitosis, can lead to aneuploidy. A key gene in our analysis is ESPL1, which encodes an endopeptidase called Separase that separates sister chromatids by cleaving cohesin Rad21/Mcd1/Scc1 during the metaphase to anaphase transition. The hypothesis we tested is that hormonal stimulation of the p53-null mouse mammary gland results in misexpression of the ESPL1 gene, thus promoting aneuploidy and breast cancer formation. Dysregulation of the mitotic machinery that helps maintain chromosomal stability in mammary cells can result in aneuploidy and subsequently, cancer formation. We focused on Separase for the following reasons that have important implications for breast cancer: (i) Separase plays a central role in promoting faithful chromosome segregation; (ii) our previous studies strongly indicated that hormonal stimulation of p53-null mice mammary gland results in overexpression of the ESPL1 and Separase protein, which may be a direct cause of aneuploidy (5); and (iii) siRNA-mediated knockdown of Separase and Separase deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in genomic instability (6-8).An evolutionarily conserved protein complex called cohesin and an endopeptidase named Separase play pivotal roles in the accurate segregation of sister chromatids into two daughter cells. Cohesion along the length of the sister chromatids is formed during DNA replication in S phase. Cohesion along the chromosomal arms is removed during prophase and from centromeric regions at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition when Separase is activated after its inhibitory chaperone securin is degraded (9, 10).To understand how aberration in sister chromatid separation may contribute to chromosomal missegregation, we investigated the role of Separase overexpression in mouse mammary cells by using a mammary epithelial transplant model (11) as well as various biochemical and functional assays. Our results indicate that conditional overexpression of Separase alone in mammary epithelial cells with a p53 mutant background is sufficient to induce aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo. Results Conditional Expression of Mouse Separase (mSeparase) Results inAneuploidy in Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells. To examine the direct effect of ...

Purpose: A phase1study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biological effects of bortezomib in children with recurrent/refractory leukemia. Experimental Design: Bortezomib was administered twice weekly for 2 consecutive weeks at either 1.3 or 1.7 mg/m 2 dose followed by a 1-week rest. Bortezomib pharmacokinetics and nuclear factor nB (NF-nB) binding activity were evaluated during the first treatment cycle. Results:Twelve patients (nine with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, three with acute myelogenous leukemia), median age 11years (range, 1-18 years), were enrolled between May 2004 and November 2005, of whom seven were not fully evaluable for toxicity due to rapidly progressive disease or uncontrolled infection. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two patients at the 1.7 mg/m 2 dose level. One patient experienced grade 3 confusion and the other patient had grade 4 febrile neutropenia associated with grade 4 hypotension and grade 3 creatinine. Pharmacokinetic analysis at 1.3 mg/m 2 revealed a clearance of 11 mL/h/m 2 , a central volume of distribution of 6.7 L/m 2 , and a terminal half-life of 12.6 h. NF-nB activity was examined in five patients and was noted to transiently increase and then decrease 4-to 6-fold by 24 h following bortezomib in two patients. There were no objective clinical responses. Conclusions: For children with leukemia, the recommended phase 2 dose of bortezomib, administered twice weekly for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest, is 1.3 mg/m 2