Objective: It is unclear if a low or high-volume intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation strategy is better for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Two adult acute care hospitals within a single academic system. Patients: Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (ICU) from November 2016 to February 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to a restrictive IV fluid resuscitation strategy (≤ 60ml/kg of IV fluid) or usual care for the first 72 hours of care. Measurements and Main Results: We enrolled 109 patients, of whom 55 were assigned to the restrictive resuscitation group and 54 to the usual care group. The restrictive group received

No abstract