Herein, we evaluate the binding of Pb(II) and Bi(III) to cysteine-substituted versions of the TRI peptides [AcG-(LKALEEK)4G-NH2] which have previously been shown to bind Hg(II) and Cd(II) in unusual geometries as compared with small-molecule thiol ligands in aqueous solutions. Studies of Pb(II) and Bi(III) with the peptides give rise to complexes consistent with the metal ions bound to three sulfur atoms with M-S distances of 2.63 and 2.54 A, respectively. Competition experiments between the metal ions Pb(II), Cd(II), Hg(II) and Bi(III) for the peptides show that Hg(II) has the highest affinity, owing to the initial formation of the extremely strong HgS2 bond. Cd(II) and Pb(II) have comparable binding affinities at pH > 8, while Bi(III) displays the weakest affinity, following the model, M(II) + (TRI LXC)3(3-) --> M(II)(TRI LXC)3(-). While the relevant equilibria for Hg(II) binding to the TRI peptides corresponds to a strong first step forming Hg(TRI LXC)2(HTRI LXC), followed by a single deprotonation to give Hg(TRI LXC)3(-), the binding of Cd(II) and Pb(II) is consistent with initial formation of M(II)(TRI LXC)(HTRI LXC)2 (+) at pH < 5 followed by a two-proton dissociation step (pK(a2)) yielding M(II)(TRI LXC)3(-). Pb(II)(TRI LXC)(HTRI LXC)2(+) converts to Pb(II)(TRI LXC)3(-) at slightly lower pH values than the corresponding Cd(II)-peptide complexes. In addition, Pb(II) displays a lower pK (a) of binding to the "d"-substituted peptide, (TRI L12C, pK(a2) = 12.0) compared with the "a"-substituted peptide, (TRI L16C, pK (a2) = 12.6), the reverse of the order seen for Hg(II) and Cd(II). Pb(II) also showed a stronger binding affinity for TRI L12C (K(bind) = 3.2 x 10(7) M(-1)) compared with that with TRI L16C (K(bind) = 1.2 x 10(7) M(-1)) at pH > 8.

Metal ions play significant roles in most biological systems. Over the past two decades, there has been significant interest in the redesign of existing metal binding sites in proteins/peptides and the introduction of metals into folded proteins/peptides. Recent research has focused on the effects of metal binding on the overall secondary and tertiary conformations of unstructured peptides/proteins. In this context, de novo design of metallopeptides has become a valuable approach for studying the consequence of metal binding. It has been seen that metal ions not only direct folding of partially folded peptides but have at times also been the elixir for properly folding random-coil-like structures in stable secondary conformations. Work in our group has focused on binding of heavy metal ions such as Hg(II) to de novo designed alpha-helical three stranded coiled coil peptides with sequences based on the heptad repeat motif. Removal from or addition of a heptad to the parent 30-residue TRI peptide with the amino acid sequence Ac-G(LKALEEK)(4)G-NH(2) generated peptides whose self-aggregation affinities were seen to be dependent on their lengths. It was noted that adjustment in the position of the thiol from an "a" position in the case of the shorter BabyL9C to a "d" position for BabyL12C resulted in a peptide with low association affinities for itself, weaker binding with Hg(II), and a considerably faster kinetic profile for metal insertion. Similar differences in thermodynamic and kinetic parameters were also noted for the longer TRI peptides. At the same time, metal insertion into the prefolded and longer TRI and Grand peptides has clearly demonstrated that the metal binding is both thermodynamically as well kinetically different from that to unassociated peptides.

De novo design of alpha-helical peptides that self-assemble to form helical coiled coils is a powerful tool for studying molecular recognition between peptides/proteins and determining the fundamental forces involved in their folding and structure. These amphipathic helices assemble in aqueous solution to generate the final coiled coil motif, with the hydrophobic residues in the interior and the polar/hydrophilic groups on the exterior. Considerable effort has been devoted to investigate the forces that determine the overall stability and final three-dimensional structure of the coiled coils. One of the major challenges in coiled coil design is the achievement of specificity in terms of the oligomeric state, with respect to number (two, three, four, or higher), nature (homomers vs heteromers), and strand orientation (parallel vs antiparallel). As seen in nature, metal ions play an important role in this self-organization process, and the overall structure of metalloproteins is primarily the result of two driving forces: the metal coordination preference and the fold of the polypeptide backbone. Previous work in our group has shown that metal ions such as As(III) and Hg(II) can be used to enforce different aggregation states in the Cys derivatives of the designed homotrimeric coiled-coil TRI family [Ac-G(LKALEEK)4G-CONH2]. We are now interested in studying the interplay between the metal ion and peptide preferences in controlling the specificity and relative orientation of the alpha-helices in coiled coils. For this objective, two derivatives of the TRI family, TRi L2WL9C and TRi L2WL23C, have been synthesized. Along with those two peptides, two derivatives of Coil-Ser, CSL9C and CSL19C (CS = Ac-EWEALEKKLAALESKLQALEKKLEALEHG-CONH2), a similar de novo designed three-stranded coiled coil that has the potential to form antiparallel coiled coils, have also been used. Circular dichroism, UV-vis, and 199Hg and 113Cd NMR spectroscopy results reveal that the addition of Hg(II) and Cd(II) to the different mixtures of these peptides forms preferentially homotrimeric coiled coils, over a statistical population of heterotrimeric parallel and antiparallel coiled coils.

Investigators have studied how proteins enforce nonstandard geometries on metal centers to assess the question of how protein structures can define the coordination geometry and binding affinity of an active-site metal cofactor. We have shown that cysteine-substituted versions of the TRI peptide series [AcG-(LKALEEK)(4)G-NH(2)] bind Hg(II) and Cd(II) in geometries that are different from what is normally found with thiol ligands in aqueous solution. A fundamental question has been whether this structural perturbation is due to protein influence or a change in the metal geometry preference. To address this question, we have completed linear free-energy analyses that correlate the association of three-stranded coiled coils in the absence of a metal with the binding affinity of the peptides to the heavy metals, Hg(II) and Cd(II). In this paper, six new members of this family have been synthesized, replacing core leucine residues with smaller and less hydrophobic residues, consequently leading to varying degrees of self-association affinities. At the same time, studies with some smaller and longer sequenced peptides have also been examined. All of these peptides are seen to sequester Hg(II) and Cd(II) in an uncommon trigonal environment. For both metals, the binding is strong with micromolar dissociation constants. For binding of Hg(II) to the peptides, the dissociation constants range from 2.4 x 10(-)(5) M for Baby L12C to 2.5 x 10(-)(9) M for Grand L9C for binding of the third thiolate to a linear Hg(II)(pep)(2) species. The binding of Hg(II) to the peptide Grand L9C is similar in energetics for metal binding in the metalloregulatory protein, mercury responsive (merR), displaying approximately 50% trigonal Hg(II) formation at nanomolar metal concentrations. Approximately, 11 kcal/mol of the Hg(II)(Grand L9C)(3)(-) stability is due to peptide interactions, whereas only 1-4 kcal/mol stabilization results from Hg(II)(RS)(2) binding the third thiolate ligand. This further validates the hypothesis that the favorable tertiary interactions in protein systems such as merR go a long way in stabilizing nonnatural coordination environments in biological systems. Similarly, for the binding of Cd(II) to the TRI family, the dissociation constants range from 1.3 x 10(-)(6) M for Baby L9C to 8.3 x 10(-)(9) M for TRI L9C, showing a similar nature of stable aggregate formation.