Background Whether patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) have a higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) and how SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impacts on adherence to therapy has not been fully elucidated. We assessed the rate and clinical presentation of COVID-19, and adherence to therapy in a large cohort of patients with ARD followed-up in a tertiary University-Hospital in Northeast Italy. Methods Between April 9th and April 25th , 2020, after SARS-CoV-2 infection peak, a telephone survey investigating the impact of COVID-19 on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) was administered. Demographics, disease activity status, therapy, occupational exposure, and adherence to social distancing advise were also collected. Results 916 patients (397 SLE, 182 AAV, 176 SSc, 111 RA, 50 IIM) completed the survey. 148 patients developed at least one symptom compatible with COVID-19 (cough 96, sore throat 64, fever 64, arthromyalgias 59, diarrhea 26, conjunctivitis 18, ageusia/hyposmia, 18). Among the 916 patients, 65 (7.1%) underwent SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab (18 symptomatic and 47 asymptomatic), 2 (0.21%) tested positive, a proportion similar to that observed in the general population of the Veneto region. No deaths occurred. 31 patients (3.4%) withdrew ≥1 medication, mainly immunosuppressants or biologics. Adoption of social distancing was observed by 860 patients (93.9%), including 335 (36.6%) who adopted it before official lockdown. Conclusions COVID-19 incidence seems to be similar in our cohort compared to the general population. Adherence to therapy and to social distancing advise was high.

No abstract

No abstract

Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) involvement is a common feature in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)associated vasculitis (AAV), particularly in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Over the last decade, substantial advancement has been made in understanding AAV pathogenesis, classification, and treatment. Typical ENT symptoms may include sinonasal, otologic, pharyngeal, and laryngeal manifestations. The otolaryngologic symptoms of AAV sometimes might be misdiagnosed in etiology as infectious or allergic. Thus, rapid recognition and early diagnosis of AAV as the cause of the symptoms prevent the risk of irreversible organ damage. The high impact of ENT symptoms on the quality of life of AAV patients confirms the importance of their early treatment through specific local and systemic approaches. Appropriate interdisciplinary management to early recognition of AAV and initiation of treatment may reduce morbidity in these patients. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to describe the clinical, histological, and radiological findings of ENT involvement in AAV and to update their surgical and therapeutic management, with a focus also on the role of a multidisciplinary team, involving the otorhinolaryngologist.

BackgroundRituximab (RTX) achieved high remission-induction and sustained maintenance rates for patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) [1], [2]. However, RTX is an expensive medication, which may potentially lead to serious side effects. Defining the best dose regimen for maintenance in AAV is still an unmet need.ObjectivesThe aim of the present study is to compare the effects of ultra-low dose RTX (500 mg or 1000 mg once per year) to standard low dose RTX (500 or 1000 mg twice per year) as remission-maintenance therapy in AAV patients.MethodsWe included consecutive AAV patients (classified as GPA and MPA [3]) referring to four different Rheumatology centers in Italy. We assessed all AAV patients who successfully achieved disease remission (BVASv3=0) with conventional RTX or cyclophosphamide regimens and have been subsequently treated with RTX for maintenance of remission. All included patients received at least three maintenance infusions with either 1000 mg or 500 mg, twice per year (standard low dose) or once per year (ultra-low dose). After a period of 18 months, we assessed the remission rate, damage (VDI), glucocorticoids intake, ANCA status, B-cells depletion and serum IgG levels.ResultsFrom January 2011 to December 2021, 83 AAV patients (mean age 51±16, 49.4% female, 95.2% ANCA positive, 65.8% anti PR3, 34.2% anti MPO), 61 classified as GPA and 22 MPA, achieved complete disease remission with conventional RTX induction regimen. After 7 [6-9] months, 29.9% patients started maintenance treatment with ultra-low dose RTX (once per year), while 70.1% patients with standard low dose (twice per year), for 18 months. No significant differences at baseline were noted between patients receiving ultra-low dose when compared to those treated with conventional low-dose.At the end of observation period, a disease flare was observed in 22.7% of the low-dose group, and 21.2% in those treated with the standard dose (p=0.881). Relapse-free survival was comparable between the two group (log-rank p=0.818, Figure 1).Figure 1.When comparing AAV patients treated with ultra-low dose regimen to those treated with low-dose, no differences were noted in negative ANCA rate (72.2% vs 67.1%, p=0.262), ANCA titer (0 [0-7.8] vs 0 [0-50] UI/mL, p=0.232), B-cells depletion rate (70.6% vs 75%, p=0.725), mean serum IgG (811 [146-922] vs 680 [429-861] mg/dL, p=0.367), mean daily glucocorticoid dosage (2.5 [0-5] vs 3.75 [0-5] mg/d, p=0.647), VDI (4 [1-5] vs 2 [1-4], p=0.098), hypogammaglobulinaemia rate (31.8% vs 36.5%, p=0.697) and deaths (4.5% vs 5.8%, p=0.831).Although not significant, patients treated with ultra-low dose had lower severe infection rate (10.5% vs 26.8%, p=0.154). Notably, in the all cohort 5 deaths were related to COVID19 pneumonia.ConclusionReduced exposure to RTX was not associated with an impaired efficacy of maintenance therapy in patients with AAV. Remission maintenance with ultra-low dose RTX is a safe and more cost-effective option.References[1]B. Terrier et al., “ANCA-associated vasculitides: Recommendations of the French Vasculitis Study Group on the use of immunosuppressants and biotherapies for remission induction and maintenance,” Press. Medicale, vol. 49, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2020.104031.[2]S. V. Moiseev, N. M. Bulanov, A. S. Zykova, and P. I. Novikov, “Rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis: Fewer infusions or ultra low-dose maintenance therapy,” Ann. Rheum. Dis., vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 1–2, 2019, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213873.[3]J. C. Jennette et al., “2012 Revised International Chapel Hill consensus conference nomenclature of vasculitides,” Arthritis Rheum., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2013, doi: 10.1002/art.37715.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared